Skip to main content

CoRank: A Coupled Dual Networks Approach to Trust Evaluation on Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2018 (WISE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11233))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The trust evaluation of information and people is crucial for maintaining an open and healthy Online Social Networks (OSN) platform for society. In this work, we develop a Coupled Dual Networks Trust Ranking (CoRank) method to measure the trustworthiness of users and tweets by analysing user/tweet behaviour on Twitter. This method goes beyond the existing solutions that use a single network to represent both users and tweets. A set of experiments have been conducted against the real data collected from Twitter. The experimental results show the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method. We compare our solution with two baseline methods PageRank and TURank, and analyse how our approach outperforms the existing ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Garadi, M.A., Varathan, K.D., Ravana, S.D., Ahmed, E.: Analysis of online social network connections for identification of influential users: survey and open research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(1), article 16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aslam, S.: Twitter by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/twitter-statistics/. Accessed 3 Apr 2018

  3. Balmin, A., Hristidis, V., Papakonstantinou, Y.: Objectrank: authority-based key-word search in databases. In: VLDB, vol. 30, pp. 564–575 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartoletti, M., Lande, S., Massa, A.: Faderank: an incremental algorithm for ranking Twitter users. In: Cellary, W., Mokbel, M.F., Wang, J., Wang, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Y. (eds.) WISE 2016, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10042, pp. 55–69. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48743-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cha, M., Haddai, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: AAAI on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 10–17 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eliacik, A.B., Erdogan, N.: Sentiment analysis, influential user, social network analysis, microblogging service. Expert. Syst. Appl. 92, 403–418 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayo-Avello, D.: Nepotistic relationships in Twitter and their impact on rank prestige algorithms. Inf. Process. Manag. 49(6), 1250–1280 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P., Castillo, C., Meier, P.: TweetCred: real-time credibility assessment of content on Twitter. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds.) SocInfo 2014. LNCS, vol. 8851, pp. 228–243. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, R., He, C., Ge, Y., Wang, M., Wu, X.: User vitality ranking and prediction in social networking services: a dynamic network perspective. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29(6), 1343–1356 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, H., et al.: Tweet ranking based on heterogeneous networks. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp. 1239–1256 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM 46, 604–632 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, M., Sun, X., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J.: Privacy-aware access control with trust management in web service. World Wide Web 14, 407–430 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagmoti, R., Teredesai, A., Cock, D.M.: Ranking approaches for microblog search. In: International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 153–157 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd., T.: The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, G., Wang, H., Tao, X., Zhang, J.: A self-stabilizing algorithm for finding a minimal positive influence dominating set in social networks. In: Proceedings of ADC, pp. 93–99 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., He, Q.: TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: ACM WSDM, pp. 261–270 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yamaguchi, Y., Takahashi, T., Amagasa, T., Kitagawa, H.: TURank: Twitter user ranking based on user-tweet graph analysis. In: Chen, L., Triantafillou, P., Suel, T. (eds.) WISE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6488, pp. 240–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17616-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, L., Hua, T., Lu, C.T., Chen, I.R.: A topic-focused trust model for Twitter. Comput. Commun. 76, 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peiyao Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, P., Zhao, W., Yang, J. (2018). CoRank: A Coupled Dual Networks Approach to Trust Evaluation on Twitter. In: Hacid, H., Cellary, W., Wang, H., Paik, HY., Zhou, R. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2018. WISE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02922-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02922-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02921-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02922-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics