Skip to main content

Creative Concept Generation by Combining Description Logic of Typicality, Probabilities and Cognitive Heuristics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI*IA 2018 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11298))

Abstract

We propose a nonmonotonic Description Logic of typicality as a tool for the generation and the exploration of novel creative concepts, that could be useful in many applicative scenarios, ranging from video games to the creation of new movie characters. In particular, our logic is able to deal with the phenomenon of prototypical concept combination, which has been shown to be problematic to model for other formalisms like fuzzy logic. The proposed logic relies on the logic of typicality \(\mathcal {ALC} + \mathbf{T}_\mathbf{R}\), whose semantics is based on a notion of rational closure, as well as on the distributed semantics of probabilistic Description Logics, and takes into account the insights coming from the heuristics used by humans for concept composition. Besides providing framework able to account for typicality-based concept combination, we also outline that reasoning in the proposed Description Logic is ExpTime-complete as for the underlying \(\mathcal {ALC}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, we focus on the proposal of the formalism itself, therefore the machinery for obtaining probabilities from an application domain will not be discussed.

  2. 2.

    Here we assume that some methods for the automatic assignment of the HEAD/MODIFER pairs are/may be available and focus on the discussion of the reasoning part.

References

  1. Frixione, M., Lieto, A.: Representing concepts in formal ontologies: compositionality vs. typicality effects. Log. Log. Philos. 21(4), 391–414 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E.: On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 9(1), 35–58 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lieto, A., Pozzato, G.L.: A description logic of typicality for conceptual combination. In: Ceci, M., Japkowicz, N., Liu, J., Papadopoulos, G.A., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11177, pp. 189–199. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01851-1_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: Semantic characterization of rational closure: from propositional logic to description logics. Artif. Intell. 226, 1–33 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artif. Intell. 55(1), 1–60 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Riguzzi, F., Bellodi, E., Lamma, E., Zese, R.: Reasoning with probabilistic ontologies. In: Yang, Q., Wooldridge, M., (eds.): Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25–31 July 2015, pp. 4310–4316. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hampton, J.A.: Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Mem. Cogn. 15(1), 55–71 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieto, A., Minieri, A., Piana, A., Radicioni, D.P.: A knowledge-based system for prototypical reasoning. Connect. Sci. 27, 137–152 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hampton, J.A.: Conceptual combinations and fuzzy logic. Concepts Fuzzy Log. 209, 209–232 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, M., Lawry, J.: Hierarchical conceptual spaces for concept combination. Artif. Intell. 237, 204–227 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, E.E., Osherson, D.N.: Conceptual combination with prototype concepts. Cogn. Sci. 8(4), 337–361 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gärdenfors, P.: The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagai, Y., Taura, T.: Formal description of concept-synthesizing process for creative design. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition ’06, pp. 443–460. Springer, Dordrecht (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Confalonieri, R., Schorlemmer, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., Plaza, E., Eppe, M.: Conceptual blending in EL++. In: Lenzerini, M., Peñaloza, R., (eds.): CEUR Workshop Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics, Cape Town, South Africa, 22–25 April 2016, vol. 1577. CEUR-WS.org (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eppe, M., et al.: A computational framework for conceptual blending. Artif. Intell. 256, 105–129 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Pozzato, G.L.: Reasoning in description logics with typicalities and probabilities of exceptions. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds.) ECSQARU 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10369, pp. 409–420. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_37

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pozzato, G.L.: Reasoning about plausible scenarios in description logics of typicality. Intell. Artif. 11(1), 25–45 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Riguzzi, F., Bellodi, E., Lamma, E., Zese, R.: Probabilistic description logics under the distribution semantics. Semant. Web 6(5), 477–501 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: Rational closure in \(\cal{SHIQ}\). In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings DL 2014, 27th International Workshop on Description Logics, vol. 1193, pp. 543–555. CEUR-WS.org (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Pozzato, G.L., Renzulli, R.: An efficient reasoner for description logics of typicality and rational closure. In: Artale, A., Glimm, B., Kontchakov, R., (eds.): CEUR Workshop Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics, Montpellier, France, 18–21 July 2017, vol. 1879. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the project “ExceptionOWL: Nonmonotonic Extensions of Description Logics and OWL for defeasible inheritance with exceptions”, Università di Torino and Compagnia di San Paolo, call 2014 “Excellent (young) PI”. Gian Luca Pozzato has been also partially supported by the project “iNdAM GNCS” - Metodi di prova orientati al ragionamento automatico per logiche non-classiche.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Luca Pozzato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lieto, A., Pozzato, G.L. (2018). Creative Concept Generation by Combining Description Logic of Typicality, Probabilities and Cognitive Heuristics. In: Ghidini, C., Magnini, B., Passerini, A., Traverso, P. (eds) AI*IA 2018 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03840-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03840-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03840-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics