Skip to main content

On the Use of Matrix Based Representation to Deal with Automatic Composer Recognition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2018)

Abstract

In this article the use of a matrix based representation of pieces is tested for the classification of musical pieces of some well known classical composers. The pieces in two corpora have been represented in two ways: matrices of interval pair probabilities and a set of 12 global features which had previously been used in a similar task. The classification accuracies of both representations have been computed using several supervised classification algorithms. A class binarization technique has also been applied to study how the accuracies change with this kind of methods. Promising results have been obtained which show that both the matrix representation and the class binarization techniques are suitable to be used in the automatic composer recognition problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Conklin, D.: Multiple viewpoint systems for music classification. J. New Music Res. 42(1), 19ā€“26 (2013)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Conklin, D., Witten, I.H.: Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. J. New Music Res. 24, 51ā€“73 (1995)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Dor, O., Reich, Y.: An evaluation of musical score characteristics for automatic classification of composers. Comput. Music J. 35(3), 86ā€“97 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. FĆ¼rnkranz, J.: Round robin classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 721ā€“747 (2002)

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Galar, M., FernĆ”ndez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognit. 44(8), 1761ā€“1776 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Goienetxea, I., MartĆ­nez-Otzeta, J.M., Sierra, B., Mendialdua, I.: Towards the use of similarity distances to music genre classification: a comparative study. PLOS ONE 13(2), 1ā€“18 (2018)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Goienetxea, I., Neubarth, K., Conklin, D.: Melody classification with pattern covering. In: 9th International Workshop on Music and Machine Learning (MML 2016), Riva del Garda, Italy (2016)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10ā€“18 (2009)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Herremans, D., Sƶrensen, K., Martens, D.: Classification and generation of composer-specific music using global feature models and variable neighborhood search. Comput. Music J. 39(3), 71ā€“91 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Hillewaere, R., Manderick, B., Conklin, D.: Global feature versus event models for folk song classification. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Kobe, Japan, pp. 729ā€“733 (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Hillewaere, R., Manderick, B., Conklin, D.: String methods for folk tune genre classification. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Porto, Portugal (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. van Kranenburg, P., Conklin, D.: A pattern mining approach to study a collection of Dutch folk-songs. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA 2016), Dublin, pp. 71ā€“73 (2016)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Mckay, C., Fujinaga, I.: jsymbolic: a feature extractor for midi files. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 302ā€“305 (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Sapp, C.S.: Online database of scores in the humdrum file format. In: ISMIR 2005, Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 11ā€“15 September 2005, London, UK, pp. 664ā€“665 (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the Basque Government Research Teams grant (IT900-16) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. TIN2015-64395-R (MINECO/FEDER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izaro Goienetxea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goienetxea, I., Mendialdua, I., Sierra, B. (2018). On the Use of Matrix Based Representation to Deal with Automatic Composer Recognition. In: Mitrovic, T., Xue, B., Li, X. (eds) AI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03991-2_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03991-2_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03990-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03991-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics