Skip to main content

Word Sense Comparison Between DCC and GKB

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Lexical Semantics (CLSW 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese (DCC) is an authoritative, human-oriented dictionary that defines word senses in natural language. The Contemporary Chinese Grammatical Knowledge Base (GKB) uses detailed syntactic information to describe word senses. The combination of DCC and GKB will be helpful for studying the problem of word sense distinction and word sense disambiguation (WSD). In this paper, we defined the types of alignment of the individual word sense and the types of word sense granularity correspondence. We also designed semi-auto algorithm that used the similarity of definitions and example sentences to compute words sense alignment. The algorithm turned definitions and example sentences into word sequences, and then used sememes of HowNet to compute the similarity of word sequences. The individual word sense alignment and word sense granularity correspondence are constructed based on the similarity. This algorithm was used to construct the individual word sense alignment table and word sense granularity correspondence relation of intersection words of the two dictionaries. The results of word sense granularity correspondence relation analyzing showed that the word sense alignment between DCC and GKB are quite complicated. The completely “equal” sense mainly exists in the monosemy. Generally speaking, the word sense granularity of GKB is larger than that of DCC. There are “no correspondence” word senses in both dictionaries. The integration of semantic meaning and syntactic information of the two dictionaries can be achieved based on sense alignment and will be helpful for solving natural language processing problems such as WSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xiao, H.: The sense relations and sense distinction of polysemy in the dictionary. J. Yunnan Normal Univ. 42(1), 41–46 (2016). (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Language Institute Dictionary Room: Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese, 5th edn. The Commercial Press, Beijing (2005). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, S.W.: Detailed explanation of Contemporary Chinese Grammatical Knowledge Base. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2003). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mei, J.J., Zhu, Y.M., Gao, Y.Q.: Synonym word forest, 2nd edn. Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, Shanghai (1996). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, Z.D., Dong, Q.: The study of the Hownet and Chinese. Contemp. Linguist. 3(1), 33–44 (2016). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jing, P., Wu, Y.F., Yu, S.W.: Survey of word sense annotated corpus construction. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 22(3), 16–23 (2008). (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, G.A., Leacock, C., Tengi, R., et al.: A semantic concordance. In: The Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 303–308 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ng, H.T., Lee, H.B.: Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: an exemplar-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 40–47. Association for Computational Linguistics (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, Y., Jin, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, S.: A Chinese corpus with word sense annotation. In: Matsumoto, Y., Sproat, Richard W., Wong, K.-F., Zhang, M. (eds.) ICCPOL 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4285, pp. 414–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11940098_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao, H., Yang, L.J.: Dictionary informed corpus word sense annotation. Appl. Linguist. 2, 135–141 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qiu, L.K., Zhao, H., Yu, S.W., et al.: Analysis of parts-of-speech correspondence between DCC an GKB. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 31(5), 1–7 (2017). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, H., Mu, L., Zan, H.: Computation of word similarity based on the information content of Sememes and PageRank algorithm. Chinese Lexical Semantics. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10085, pp. 416–425. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingling Mu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mu, L., Cheng, X., Han, Y., Zan, H. (2018). Word Sense Comparison Between DCC and GKB. In: Hong, JF., Su, Q., Wu, JS. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04015-4_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04015-4_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04014-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04015-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics