Skip to main content

Comparing Player Responses to Choice-Based Interactive Narratives Using Facial Expression Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11318))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Interactive storytelling balances the desire to create dynamic, engaging experiences around characters and situations with the practical considerations of the cost of producing content. We describe a method for assessing player experience by analyzing player facial expressions following key content events in The Wolf Among Us by Telltale Games. Two metrics, engagement and valence, are extracted for six participants who play the first episode of the game. An analysis of the variance and distribution of responses relative to emotionally charged content events and choices suggests that content is designed around events that serve to anchor player emotions while providing the freedom to respond through emotionally-motivated choice selections and content elicitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The specific AUs used in each metric can be found at Affectiva’s website, https://developer.affectiva.com/mapping-expressions-to-emotions/.

References

  1. Bruni, L.E., Baceviciute, S., Arief, M.: Narrative cognition in interactive systems: suspense-surprise and the P300 ERP component. In: Mitchell, A., Fernández-Vara, C., Thue, D. (eds.) ICIDS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8832, pp. 164–175. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12337-0_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Drenikow, B., Mirza-Babaei, P.: Vixen: interactive visualization of gameplay experiences. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, p. 3. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3102071.3102089

  3. Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6(3–4), 169–200 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friesen, W.V., Ekman, P.: Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Pyschologists Press, Palo Alto (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hjortsjö, C.H.: Man’s Face and Mimic Language. Studen litteratur (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jalbert, J., Rank, S.: Exit 53: physiological data for improving non-player character interaction. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 25–36. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaltman, E., Osborn, J., Wardrip-Fruin, N., Mateas, M.: Getting the GISST: a toolkit for the creation, analysis and reference of game studies resources. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2017, pp. 16:1–16:10. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3102071.3102092

  8. Kim, J.H., Gunn, D.V., Schuh, E., Phillips, B., Pagulayan, R.J., Wixon, D.: Tracking real-time user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, pp. 443–452. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lombardo, V., Damiano, R.: Narrative annotation and editing of video. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 62–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez, B., Valstar, M.F., Jiang, B., Pantic, M.: Automatic analysis of facial actions: a survey. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McDuff, D., Mahmoud, A., Mavadati, M., Amr, M., Turcot, J., Kaliouby, R.E.: AFFDEX SDK: a cross-platform real-time multi-face expression recognition toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2016, pp. 3723–3726. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Medler, B., John, M., Lane, J.: Data cracker: developing a visual game analytic tool for analyzing online gameplay. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2365–2374. dl.acm.org (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mirza-Babaei, P.: Biometric storyboards: a games user research approach for improving qualitative evaluations of player experience. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nacke, L.: Affective ludology: scientific measurement of user experience in interactive entertainment. Ph.D. thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nacke, L., Lindley, C.A.: Affective ludology, flow and immersion in a First-Person shooter: measurement of player experience. The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nacke, L.E.: An introduction to physiological player metrics for evaluating games. In: Seif El-Nasr, M., Drachen, A., Canossa, A. (eds.) Game Analytics. Springer, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Paradeda, R., Ferreira, M.J., Martinho, C., Paiva, A.: Using interactive storytelling to identify personality traits. In: Nunes, N., Oakley, I., Nisi, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10690, pp. 181–192. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., Hussain, A.: A review of affective computing: from unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion. Int. J. Inf. Fusion 37, 98–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2017). https://www.R-project.org/

  20. Ravaja, N., et al.: The psychophysiology of video gaming: Phasic emotional responses to game events. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views - Worlds in Play, pp. 1–13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Saari, T., Puttonen, S., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.: The psychophysiology of james bond: phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion 8(1), 114–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, R., Isbister, K., Rubin, Z.: All the feels: introducing biometric data to online gameplay streams. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, CHI PLAY Companion 2016, pp. 261–267. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2968120.2987732

  23. Robinson, R., Murray, J., Isbister, K.: You’re giving me mixed signals! A comparative analysis of methods that capture players’ emotional response to games. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2018, pp. LBW567:1-LBW567:6. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188469

  24. Scherer, K.R., Schorr, A., Johnstone, T.: Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schoenau-Fog, H.: Hooked! Evaluating engagement as continuation desire in interactive narratives. In: Si, M., Thue, D., André, E., Lester, J.C., Tanenbaum, J., Zammitto, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7069, pp. 219–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25289-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Szilas, N., Ilea, I.: Objective metrics for interactive narrative. In: Mitchell, A., Fernández-Vara, C., Thue, D. (eds.) ICIDS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8832, pp. 91–102. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12337-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Telltale Games: The Wolf Among Us (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vermeulen, I.E., Roth, C., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C.: Measuring user responses to interactive stories: towards a standardized assessment tool. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 38–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Yannakakis, G.N., Spronck, P., Loiacono, D., André, E.: Player modeling. In: Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, vol. 6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4230/DFU.Vol6.12191.45

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Murray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Murray, J.T., Robinson, R., Mateas, M., Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2018). Comparing Player Responses to Choice-Based Interactive Narratives Using Facial Expression Analysis. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04027-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04028-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics