Skip to main content

Delving into Diversity in Substitute Ensembles and Transferability of Adversarial Examples

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11303))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2456 Accesses

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) models, e.g., state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been widely applied into security-sensitivity tasks, such as facial recognition, automated driving, etc. Then their vulnerability analysis is an emergent topic, especially for black-box attacks, where adversaries do not know the model internal architectures or training parameters. In this paper, two types of ensemble-based black-box attack strategies, iterative cascade ensemble strategy and stack parallel ensemble strategy, are proposed to explore the vulnerability of DL system and potential factors that contribute to the high-efficiency attacks are examined. Moreover, two pairwise and non-pairwise diversity measures are adopted to explore the relationship between the diversity in substitutes ensembles and transferability of crafted adversarial examples. Experimental results show that proposed ensemble adversarial attack strategies can successfully attack the DL system with ensemble adversarial training defense mechanism and the greater the diversity in substitute ensembles enables stronger transferability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Codes is available at https://github.com/HangJie720/Ensemble_Adversarial_Attack.

  2. 2.

    https://www.tensorflow.org/?hl=zh-cn.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/tensorflow/cleverhans.

References

  1. Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurakin, K., Goodfellow, J., Bengio, S.: Adversarial examples in the physical world. In: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biggio, B., et al.: Evasion attacks against machine learning at test time. In: Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S., Železný, F. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8190, pp. 387–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Jha, S., Fredrikson, M., Berkay Celik, Z., Swami, A.: The limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings. In: 1st IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp: 372–387. IEEE Press, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Szegedy, C., et al.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P.: Transferability in machine learning: from phenomena to black-box attacks using adversarial samples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07277 (2016)

  7. Tramèr, F., Papernot, N., Goodfellow, I., Boneh, D., McDaniel, P.: The space of transferable adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03453 (2017)

  8. Liu, Y., Chen, X., Liu, C., Song, D.: Delving into transferable adversarial examples and black-box attacks. In: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Berkay Celik, Z., Swami, A.: Practical black-box attacks against machine learning. In: ASIACCS, pp: 506–519. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Papernot, N., Mcdaniel, P., Sinha, A., Wellman, M.: Towards the science of security and privacy in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03814 (2016)

  11. Meng, D.Y., Chen, H.: MagNet: a two-pronged defense against adversarial examples. In: ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 135–147. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Q.L., Guo, W.B., Zhang, K.X., Ororbia Ii, A. G., Xing, X., Liu, X.: Adversary resistant deep neural networks with an application to malware detection. In: 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp: 1145–1153. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhagoji, A, J., Cullina, D., Mittal, P.: Dimensionality Reduction as a Defense against Evasion Attacks on Machine Learning Classifiers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02654 (2017)

  14. Tramèr, F., Kurakin, A., Papernot, N., Boneh, D., McDaniel, P.: Ensemble adversarial training: attacks and defenses. In: 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I., Bengio, S.: Adversarial machine learning at scale. In: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Wu, X.: Distillation as a defense to adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), vol. 00, pp. 582–597. IEEE, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: 38th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 39–57. IEEE, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boer, P.T.D., Kroese, D.P., Mannor, S., Rubinstein, R.Y.: A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Ann. Oper. Res. 134(1), 19–67 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Grosse, K., Papernot, N., Manoharan, P., Backes, M., McDaniel, P.: Adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks for malware classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04435 (2016)

  20. Ludmila, I.K., Whiker, C.J.: Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles
and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Mach. Learn. 2(51), 181–207 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61603197, 61772284, 41571389).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hang, J., Han, K., Li, Y. (2018). Delving into Diversity in Substitute Ensembles and Transferability of Adversarial Examples. In: Cheng, L., Leung, A., Ozawa, S. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11303. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04182-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04182-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04181-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04182-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics