Skip to main content

Formal Methods in Systems Integration: Deployment of Formal Techniques in INSPEX

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Systems Design & Management (CSD&M 2018)

Abstract

Inspired by the abilities of contemporary autonomous vehicles to navigate with a high degree of effectiveness, the INSPEX Project aims to create a minaturised smart obstacle detection system, which could find use in a wide variety of leading edge smart applications. The primary use case focused on in the project is producing an advanced prototype for a device which can be attached to a visually impaired or blind (VIB) person’s white cane, and which, through the integration of a variety of minaturised sensors, and of the processing of their data via sophisticated algorithms, can offer the VIB user greater precision of information about their environment. The increasing complexity of such systems creates increasing challenges to assure their correct operation, inviting the introduction of formal techniques to aid in maximising system dependability. However, the major challenge to building such systems resides at the hardware end of the development. This impedes the routine application of top-down formal methods approaches. Some ingenuity must be brought to bear, in order that normally mutually hostile formal and mainstream approaches can contribute positively towards system dependability, rather than conflicting unproductively. This aspect is illustrated using two strands of the INSPEX Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some niche areas, the recognition came as a direct result of painful and expensive failure, the Pentium Bug and Arianne Disaster being iconic examples.

  2. 2.

    It became apparent at this time that scalable formal tools were not an impossible dream, even if the degree of scalability was not as great as typically found in conventional approaches.

  3. 3.

    For reasons of the confidentiality of the future commercial exploitation of the INSPEX platform, what is shown here is not actual code.

References

  1. Alloy. http://alloy.mit.edu/

  2. Abrial, J.R.: The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abrial, J.R.: Formal Methods in Industry: Achievements. Problems Future. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE ICSE 2006, pp. 761–768 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abrial, J.R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering. CUP (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andronick, J., Jeffery, R., Klein, G., Kolanski, R., Staples, M., Zhang, H., Zhu, L.: Large-scale formal verification in practice: a process perspective. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE ICSE 2012, pp. 374–393 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Astrée Tool. http://www.astree.ens.fr/

  7. Baeten, J.: Process Algebra. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banach, R. (ed.): Special Issue on the State of the Art in Formal Methods. Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 13(5) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. BLAST Tool. https://forge.ispras.ru/projects/blast/

  10. Bluetooth Guide. http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/50002466B.pdf

  11. Bowen, J., Hinchey, M.: Seven more myths of formal methods. IEEE Software 12, 34–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, E., Wing, J.: Formal methods: state of the art and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 28, 626–643 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dia, R., Mottin, J., Rakotavao, T., Puschini, D., Lesecq, S.: Evaluation of occupancy grid resolution through a novel approach for inverse sensor modeling. In: Proceedings of IFAC World Congress, FAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50, pp. 13,841–13,847 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Divakaran, S., D’Souza, D., Kushwah, A., Sampath, P., Sridhar, N., Woodcock, J.: Refinement-based verification of the FreeRTOS scheduler in VCC. In: Butler, M., Conchon, S., Zaïdi, F. (eds.) Proceedings of ICFEM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9407, pp. 170–186. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fausten, M.: Evolution or revolution: architecture of AD cars. In: Proceedings of IEEE ESWEEK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. FDR Tool. https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/projects/fdr/

  17. Fitzgerald, J., Gorm Larsen, P.: Modelling Systems: Practical Tools and Techniques for Software Development. Cambridge University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. FreeRTOS. https://www.freertos.org/

  19. Hall, A.: Seven myths of formal methods. IEEE Software 7, 11–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoare, C.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO/IEC 13568: Information Technology – Z Formal Specification Notation – Syntax, Type System and Semantics: International Standard (2002). http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c021573_ISO_IEC_13568_2002(E).zip

  22. Jones, C.: Systematic Software Development Using VDM, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, C., O’Hearne, P., Woodcock, J.: Verified software: a grand challenge. IEEE Comput. 39(4), 93–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lamport, L.: Specifying Systems, The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers. Addison-Wesley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mandruchi, R., Kurniavan, S.: Mobility-Related Accidents Experienced by People with Visual Impairment. Insight: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. NuSMV Tool. http://nusmv.fbk.eu/

  28. Qu, Z.: Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems: Applications to Autonomous Vehicles. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. RODIN Tool. http://www.event-b.org/, http://sourceforge.net/projects/rodin-b-sharp/

  30. de Roever, W.P., Engelhardt, K.: Data Refinement: Model-Oriented Proof Methods and their Comparison. Cambridge University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosburg, T.: Tactile ground surface indicators in public places. In: Grunwald, M. (ed.) Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications. Springer, Birkhauser (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spivey, J.: The Z Notation: A Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall International (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stepney, S.: New Horizons in Formal Methods. The Computer Bulletin, pp. 24–26 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stepney, S., Cooper, D.: Formal Methods for Industrial Products. In: Proceedings of 1st Conference of B and Z Users. LNCS, vol. 1878, pp. 374–393. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thrun, S., Burgard, W., Fox, D.: Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. UPPAAL Tool. http://www.uppaal.org/

  37. Wikipedia: List of tools for static code analysis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_ for_static_code_analysis

  38. Woodcock, J.: First steps in the the verified software grand challenge. IEEE Computer 39(10), 57–64 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Woodcock, J., Banach, R.: The verification grand challenge. JUCS 13, 661–668 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 730953. The work was also supported in part by the Swiss Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) under Grant 16.0136 730953. We thank them for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Banach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Banach, R. et al. (2019). Formal Methods in Systems Integration: Deployment of Formal Techniques in INSPEX. In: Bonjour, E., Krob, D., Palladino, L., Stephan, F. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. CSD&M 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04209-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04209-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04209-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics