Skip to main content

Monetary Policy Shocks and Macroeconomic Variables: Evidence from Thailand

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Structural Changes and their Econometric Modeling (TES 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 808))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 870 Accesses

Abstract

From May, 2000 up to the present day, Thailand has implemented a monetary policy of inflation targeting, with its central bank (Bank of Thailand) using a short-term interest rate as the main monetary instrument. A question arises as to whether the short-term policy interest rate remains effective as the monetary policy instrument due to the current uncertainty of global economy

Using the structural vector error correction (SVEC) model with contemporaneous and long-run restrictions, this paper has employed quarterly data for Thailand over the inflation targeting period of 2000q2–2017q2 to investigate the relationship among monetary policy shocks and some key macroeconomic variables in Thailand under the operation of the inflation targeting. This study finds significant feedback relations among the six variables in the specified SVEC model, namely real output, prices, interest rates, monetary aggregates, exchange rates and trade balance. It also suggests that the effects of monetary policy on macroeconomic variables in Thailand are mostly consistent with theoretical expectations. The overall results provide support to an argument that price stability is required for sustained economic growth. More importantly, the policy interest rate remains valid and effective as the monetary instrument for price stability under inflation targeting

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is an argument that central banks do not, and cannot, impose control over the long-term interest rate without controlling the money growth rate. The use of a short-term interest rate as the monetary instrument makes the money-growth rate unstable. Unstable money growth makes the inflation and hence the interest rate unstable [2, 13].

  2. 2.

    The variables in an SVEC model represent a multivariate system of endogenous variables, which maintain dynamically feedback relations. For identification purposes, some restrictions are imposed on the long-run and the short-run (or contemporaneous) relations among variables in the SVEC model.

  3. 3.

    Considering only one cointegrating relation. The reason behind this consideration is that we emphasize a monetary policy shock as only one transitory shock. The identification of the long-run restrictions is also based on the assumption of money neutrality that a monetary policy does not permanently affect real variables in the long-run.

  4. 4.

    The zeros are the restricted element and the asterisks are unrestricted elements.

  5. 5.

    In estimation procedure, this study uses the R program by Pfaff [25].

  6. 6.

    Since the trade balance, which is the difference between exports and imports, might be negative values; it could not take the logarithm transformation.

  7. 7.

    The ADF test is based on the null-hypothesis that the series under testing has a unit root. The KPSS test is based on the hypothesis that the series under consideration is stationary and hence does not have a unit root.

  8. 8.

    The improvement of the trade balance is driven by the relatively strong import contraction. The reason behind this is that the contractionary monetary policy shock shrinks the output and, in turn, reduces import demand. This effect is called ’the income absorption effect.

  9. 9.

    The impulse response functions that contradict theory predictions are known as empirical puzzles that are often found in monetary literature. These anomalies may come from modelling issues e.g. identification and data limitations with a short time span.

  10. 10.

    The reason behind this is that an expansionary monetary policy raises domestic income and, in turn, increases import demand, which leads to a deterioration of the trade balance.

References

  1. Arwatchanakarn, P.: Structural vector autoregressive analysis of monetary policy in Thailand. Sociol. Study 7(3), 133–145 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arwatchanakarn, P.: Exchange rate policy, monetary policy and economic growth in Thailand: a macroeconomic study, 1950–2016. The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charoenseang, J., Manakit, P.: Thai monetary policy transmission in an inflation targeting era. J. Asian Econ. 18(1), 144–157 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chucherd, T.: Monetary and fiscal policy interactions in Thailand. Bank of Thailand, Bangkok (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Disyatat, P., Vongsinsirikul, P.: Monetary policy and the transmission mechanism in Thailand. J. Asian Econ. 14(3), 389–418 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Enders, W.: Applied Econometric Time Series. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faust, J., Leeper, E.M.: When do long-run identifying restrictions give reliable results? J. Bus. Econ. Stat. (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/1392338.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, L.A., Huh, H.S.: Identification methods in vector-error correction models: equivalence results. J. Econ. Surv. 28(1), 1–16 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fung, B.S., Kasumovich, M.: Monetary shocks in the G-6 countries: is there a puzzle? J. Monet. Econ. 42(3), 575–592 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grenville, S., Ito, T.: An independent evaluation of the Bank of Thailand’s monetary policy under the inflation targeting framework, 2000–2010. Bank of Thailand, Bangkok (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grilli, V., Roubini, N.: Liquidity and exchange rates: puzzling evidence from the G-7 countries. New York University, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hesse, H.: Monetary policy, structural break and the monetary transmission mechanism in Thailand. J. Asian Econ. 18(4), 649–669 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hossain, A.: The Evolution of Central Banking and Monetary Policy in the Asia-Pacific. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hossain, A., Arwatchanakarn, P.: Inflation and inflation volatility in Thailand. Appl. Econ. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1130215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain, A.A., Arwatchanakarn, P.: Does money have a role in monetary policy for price stability under inflation targeting in Thailand? J. Asian Econ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivrendi, M., Guloglu, B.: Monetary shocks, exchange rates and trade balances: evidence from inflation targeting countries. Econ. Modell. 27(5), 1144–1155 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang, K., Ogaki, M.: The effects of monetary policy shocks on exchange rates: a structural vector error correction model approach. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 18(1), 99–114 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, S.: Effects of monetary policy shocks on the trade balance in small open European countries. Econ. Lett. 71(2), 197–203 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, S., Roubini, N.: Exchange rate anomalies in the industrial countries: a solution with a structural VAR approach. J. Monet. Econ. 45(3), 561–586 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koray, F., McMillin, W.D.: Monetary shocks, the exchange rate, and the trade balance. J. Int. Money Financ. 18(6), 925–940 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. King, R., Plosser, C., Stock, J., Watson, M.: Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. Am. Econ. Rev. 81(4), 819–840 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kubo, A.: Macroeconomic impact of monetary policy shocks: evidence from recent experience in Thailand. J. Asian Econ. 19(1), 83–91 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lütkepohl, H.: New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Pagan, A.R., Pesaran, M.H.: Econometric analysis of structural systems with permanent and transitory shocks. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 32(10), 3376–3395 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Pfaff, B.: VAR, SVAR and SVEC models: implementation within R package vars. J. Stat. Softw. 27(4), 1–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Phiromswad, P.: Measuring monetary policy with empirically grounded restrictions: an application to Thailand. J. Asian Econ. 38, 104–113 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Popkarn Arwatchanakarn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arwatchanakarn, P. (2019). Monetary Policy Shocks and Macroeconomic Variables: Evidence from Thailand. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S. (eds) Structural Changes and their Econometric Modeling. TES 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 808. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics