Skip to main content

Measuring U.S. Business Cycle Using Markov-Switching Model: A Comparison Between Empirical Likelihood Estimation and Parametric Estimations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Structural Changes and their Econometric Modeling (TES 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 808))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 878 Accesses

Abstract

Markov-switching (MS) model is one of the most popular nonlinear time series models in the literature. However, as there are many methods for parameter estimation, the results including the plot are not similar and become more difficult for researchers to decide on the interpretation. Therefore, this study is conducted as we want to obtain a more sensitive estimation method for the MS model. This study attempts to improve the way we estimate the MS model by developing a more flexible estimator for it to be called a maximum empirical likelihood estimation (MELE). A key point of this method is that a conventional parametric likelihood is replaced by the empirical likelihood function with relatively minor modifications to existing recursive filters. To evaluate the new method’s performance, we apply the MS model to the U.S. business cycle. The estimated results from the MELE are discussed and compared to those from classical parametric estimations. It is found that the empirical likelihood could outperform the classical likelihood estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B.A., Flint, J., Robinson, E.S., MunafĂ², M.R.: Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14(5), 365 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandt, P.: MSBVAR: Markov-Switching, Bayesian, vector autoregression models. R package version 0.9-1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S.X., Van Keilegom, I.: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression. Test 18(3), 415–447 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 39(1), 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, J.D.: A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 357–384(1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Howrey, E.P.: The role of time series analysis in econometric model evaluation. In: Evaluation of Econometric Models, pp. 275–307 (1980)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, C.J., Nelson, C.R.: Has the US economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle. Rev. Econ. Stat. 81(4), 608–616 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lourens, S., Zhang, Y., Long, J.D., Paulsen, J.S.: Bias in estimation of a mixture of normal distributions. J. Biom. Biostat. 4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maneejuk, P., Yamaka, W., Sriboonchitta, S.: A Markov-switching model with mixture distribution regimes. In: International Symposium on Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making, pp. 312–323. Springer, Cham, March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mykland, P.A.: Bartlett identities and large deviations in likelihood theory. Ann. Stat. 27(3), 1105–1117 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen, A.B.: Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75(2), 237–249 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Owen, A.: Empirical likelihood for linear models. Ann. Stat., 1725–1747 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Peto, R., Pike, M., Armitage, P., Breslow, N.E., Cox, D.R., Howard, S.V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., Smith, P.G.: Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br. J. Cancer 35(1), 1 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Springer, T., Urban, K.: Comparison of the EM algorithm and alternatives. Numer. Algorithms 67(2), 335–364 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sriboochitta, S., Yamaka, W., Maneejuk, P., Pastpipatkul, P.: A generalized information theoretical approach to non-linear time series model. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S., Huynh, V.N. (eds.) Robustness in Econometrics, pp. 333–348. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Variyath, A.M., Chen, J., Abraham, B.: Empirical likelihood based variable selection. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140(4), 971–981 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paravee Maneejuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maneejuk, P., Yamaka, W., Sriboonchitta, S. (2019). Measuring U.S. Business Cycle Using Markov-Switching Model: A Comparison Between Empirical Likelihood Estimation and Parametric Estimations. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S. (eds) Structural Changes and their Econometric Modeling. TES 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 808. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics