Skip to main content

Attitudes of Heads of Education and Directors of Research Towards the Need for Social Robotics Education in Universities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11357))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We explored the attitudes of the Heads of Education and the Directors of Research towards the need for Social Robotics Courses in Finland. The methods consisted of a cross-sectional survey (n = 21) and data was analyzed with descriptive methods and Pearson correlation tests. The results showed that the attitudes of respondents towards social robots were positive and they stated that robotics courses would be essential for universities. The respondents reported that the social service and healthcare sector will use social robots in the near future, but more training sessions are needed. So far, universities have offered only few applied robotics courses for healthcare students. This study also found that the surveyed universities have not yet taken into account the development of service and social robotics in the healthcare sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tapus, A., Mataric, M., Scassellati, B.: The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. Robot. Autom. Mag. IEEE 14(1), 35–42 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duffy, B., Rooney, C., O’Hare, G., O’Donoghue, R.: What is a social robot? In: 10th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, University College Cork, Ireland, 1–3 September 1999

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Collaboration, dialogue, and human-robot interaction. In: Jarvis, R.A., Zelinsky, A. (eds.) Robotics Research. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36460-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, H., Cabibihan, J.J., Tan, Y.K.: Towards an effective design of social robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(4), 333–335 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, B., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haddadin, S., Suppa, M., Fuchs, S., Bodenmüller, T., Albu-Schäffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Towards the robotic co-worker. In: Pradalier, C., Siegwart, R., Hirzinger, G. (eds.) Robotics Research. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, pp. 261–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19457-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Sauppe, A., Mutlu, B.: The social impact of a robot co-worker in industrial settings (2015). http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~bilge/pubs/2015/CHI15-Sauppe.pdf

  8. Vänni, K.J., Korpela, A.K.: Role of social robotics in supporting employees and advancing productivity. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, J.-C., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds.) ICSR 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9388, pp. 674–683. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Vänni, K., Salin, S.: A need for service robots among health care professionals in hospitals and housing services. In: Kheddar, A., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10652, pp. 178–187. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Diep, L., Cabibihan, J.-J., Wolbring, G.: Social robotics through an anticipatory governance lens. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8755, pp. 115–124. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge, S.S., et al.: Design and development of nancy, a social robot. In: 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), pp. 568–573 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vänni, K.J., Korpela, A.K.: An effort to develop a web-based approach to assess the need for robots among the elderly. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9979, pp. 712–722. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Munton, T., Alison, M., Marrero, I., Llewellyn, A., Gibson, K., Gomersall, A.: Getting out of hospital? The evidence for shifting acute inpatient and day case services from hospitals into the community. The Health Foundation, London (2015). http://www.health.org.uk/publications/getting-out-of-hospital

  14. Muszyńska, M., Rau, R.: The old-age healthy dependency ratio in Europe. J. Population Ageing 5(3), 151–162 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. euRobotics AISBL: Strategic Research Agenda for Robotics in Europe 2014–2020, Applications: Societal Challenges, pp. 59–64 (2015). http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PPP/SRA2020_SPARC.pdf

  16. Saritas, O., Keenan, M.: Broken promises and/or techno dreams? The future of health and social services in Europe. Foresight 6(5), 281–291 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vänni, K.: Robot applications in communication. In: Smart technology solutions support the elderly to continue living in their own homes. Reports of the Ministry of the Environment 7/2017, 44-51. Ministry of the Environment in Finland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ge, S.S.: Social robotics: integrating advances in engineering and computer science. In Proceedings of Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology International Conference, pp. 9–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strachan, F.: UNSW offers first social robotics course in Australia (2016). https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/art-architecture-design/unsw-offers-first-social-robotics-course-australia

  20. University of Freiburg. Social Robotics Laboratory (2018). http://srl.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/teaching

  21. Vrije Universitet Amsterdam (2018). https://www.vu.nl/en/study-guide/2017-2018/exchange/index.aspx?view=module&origin=50989971x50989856&id=51406920

  22. Tomsk State University (2016). http://en.tsu.ru/news/tsu-is-launching-a-social-robotics-course-on-coursera

  23. MastersPortal (2018). https://www.mastersportal.com/disciplines/255/robotics.html

  24. Andrade, A., et al.: Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 10, 65–78 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Diep, L., Cabibihan, J.J., Wolbring, G.: Social robots: views of special education teachers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques, pp. 160–163 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimmo J. Vänni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vänni, K.J., Cabibihan, JJ., Salin, S.E. (2018). Attitudes of Heads of Education and Directors of Research Towards the Need for Social Robotics Education in Universities. In: Ge, S., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05204-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics