Skip to main content

Multi-objective Performance Measurement: Alternatives to PAR10 and Expected Running Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Intelligent Optimization (LION 12 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11353))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A multiobjective perspective onto common performance measures such as the PAR10 score or the expected runtime of single-objective stochastic solvers is presented by directly investigating the tradeoff between the fraction of failed runs and the average runtime. Multi-objective indicators operating in the bi-objective space allow for an overall performance comparison on a set of instances paving the way for instance-based automated algorithm selection techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bischl, B. et al.: ASlib: a benchmark library for algorithm selection. Artif. Intell. J. 237, 41–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.04.003

  2. Blot, A., Hoos, H., Jourdan, L., Marmion, M., Trautmann, H.: In: Joaquin, V. et al. (ed.) MO-ParamILS: A multi-objective automatic algorithm configuration framework, pp. 32–47. Springer International Publishing, Ischia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coello Coello, C., Lamont, G.B., van Veldhuizen, D.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, N., Auger, A., Finck, S., Ros, R.: Real-Parameter Black-Box Optimization Benchmarking 2009: Experimental Setup. Technical Report RR-6828, INRIA (2009). https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00362649v3/document

  5. Kerschke, P., Kotthoff, L., Bossek, J., Hoos, H.H., Trautmann, H.: Leveraging TSP solver complementarity through machine learning. Evol. Comput. 0(0), 1–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00215, pMID: 28836836

  6. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(4), 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS) and the DAAD PPP project No. 57314626.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakob Bossek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bossek, J., Trautmann, H. (2019). Multi-objective Performance Measurement: Alternatives to PAR10 and Expected Running Time. In: Battiti, R., Brunato, M., Kotsireas, I., Pardalos, P. (eds) Learning and Intelligent Optimization. LION 12 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05348-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05348-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05347-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05348-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics