Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Digital Technology and Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

  • 2047 Accesses

Abstract

Digital technologies are deeply embedded in the social and material world as they are penetrating into products, services, and processes. The confluence of physical and digital materiality, their rapid development, and the emergence of combinatorial innovation pose new challenges for the Information Systems (IS) field. Inspired by Jörg Becker’s famous line “strukturieren, strukturieren, strukturieren” (“to structure, to structure, to structure”), which has influenced many generations of IS students in Münster, in this short essay I discuss how “structure” (the noun) and “to structure” (the verb) are reflected in our research on digital technologies and how they can help us identify some of the challenges involved. Specifically, I discuss research challenges related to (a) the structure of digital technologies, (b) the relationship between digital technologies and structure, and (c) the structures that emerge through the design of digital technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidelines of business process modeling. In W. van der Aalst, J. Desel, & A. Oberweis (Eds.), Business Process Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 1806, pp. 30–49). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (2004). Handelsinformationssysteme. mi-Wirtschaftsbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., Heddier, M., & Seidel, S. (2015). In search of information systems (Grand) challenges. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(6), 337–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berente, N., & Yoo, Y. (2012). Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Information Systems Research, 23(2), 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, L., Seidel, S., & Gregor, S. (2015). Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary cconditions. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4039–4048).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2011). The social, the material, and the ontology of non-material technological objects. European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of theory of structuration. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultin, L., & Mähring, M. (2014). Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices. Information and Organization, 24(3), 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10/11), 609–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., … Sinz, E. J. (2011). Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary. (2018). Structure. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/structure.

  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., & Berente, N. (2013). Toward “Third Wave” information systems research: Linking sociomaterial practice with broader institutional logics. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). Milan (IT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., & Watson, R. T. (2014). Improving the societal effectiveness of IS research: The pursuit of prescriptive accuracy. Available at SSRN 2477917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., Berente, N., Lindberg, A., Lyytinen, K., & Nickerson, J. V. (2019). Communications of the ACM, 62(1),50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. M., Johnson, S. A., Tulu, B., Trudel, J., Volkoff, O., Pelletier, L. R., … Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(2), 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., & Seidel, S. (2018). Three strategies for information systems research in the presence of an efficient knowledge market. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Stefan Seidel

Authors
  1. Stefan Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Seidel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Katrin Bergener

  2. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Michael Räckers

  3. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Armin Stein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seidel, S. (2019). Digital Technology and Structure. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics