Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural Features of Digital Strategies for Municipalities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

Abstract

Today, the public sector needs to be able to quickly adapt to future developments in order to both obtain the ability to act and increase their competitiveness over labour and residents. In order to benefit from technological developments, municipalities should start to set their direction in time. One way of doing so can be to develop a digital strategy. Thus, our paper asks, “how can a digital strategy be structured in the public sector, especially for municipalities?” To answer our research question, we applied a multi-method approach. First, we use case studies, consisting of qualitative and quantitative content analysis, qualitative process analysis, expert interviews and an expert workshop, to conceptualise a structural framework for digital strategies for municipalities. Second, we take into account a survey of 145 municipalities in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany, to learn about the status quo regarding digital strategies in municipalities. We found that digital strategies can be structured by their Strategic Alignment, Strategic Formulation, Core Themes and Fields of Action. This insight allows us to recommend actions for municipalities on how to structure their future digital strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almirall, E., Wareham, J., Ratti, C., Conesa, P., Bria, F., Gaviria, A., et al. (2016). Smart cities at the crossroads: New tensions in city transformation. California Management Review, 59(1), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altiok, P. (2011). Applicable vision, mission and the effects of strategic management on crisis resolve. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthopoulos, L. G., & Reddick, C. G. (2016). Understanding electronic government research and smart city: A framework and empirical evidence. Information Polity, 21(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2016). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Taylor, R. N. (1978). The impact of cognitive styles on information system design. MIS Quarterly, 2(2), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, T. V. (1985). Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. E., & Huff, S. L. (1992). Strategy: An information systems research perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(4), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D. S., & Teubner, A. (2010). Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, S., & Wilson, D. (2003). Images of strategy. Oxford (GB): Blackwell Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, F. R. (2014). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? Architecture, City and Environment, 4(12), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, F., Kaufman, S., & Walleck, A. S. (1982). The four phases of strategic management. The Journal of Business Strategy, 2(3), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatten, K. J. (1979). Quantitative research methods in strategic management. In D. E. Schendel & C. W. Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management a new view of business policy and planning (pp. 448–467). Boston (US): Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R. T. (1980). Environment, strategy, organization structure and performance: patterns in one industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C. (1999). In search of strategy. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York City, NY (US): Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the organization. Havard Business Review, 68, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E. (2009). Antecedents of is strategic alignment: A nomological network. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 159–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, S., Raymond, L., & Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon, P. P., Kraemer, K. L., & Gurbaxani, V. (2000). Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Björn Niehaves, Kristina Röding & Frederike Marie Oschinsky

Authors
  1. Björn Niehaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristina Röding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frederike Marie Oschinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Niehaves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Katrin Bergener

  2. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Michael Räckers

  3. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Armin Stein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niehaves, B., Röding, K., Oschinsky, F.M. (2019). Structural Features of Digital Strategies for Municipalities. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation