Abstract
The boundaries of the firm have been part of economic analysis since Ronald Coase’s seminal paper on the nature of the firm. Subsequently numerous theories and explanations of the boundaries have evolved. New information and communication technology are now changing these boundaries which become increasingly blurred. Boundaries have turned to be “bounding areas” and companies interact in multiple ways. Knowledge about where these bounding areas are and how to design them has become highly relevant for companies’ success. The article shows what determines the boundary areas and how they can be organized by applying existing theories of the firm like to this problem. These theories provide guidelines for the design and the management of the boundaries of the firm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Aoki, Gustafsson & Williamson (1990) is a collection of articles in the same spirit of reconstructing the firm as a simple collection of countless small contracts.
- 2.
Jensen and Meckling admit in their catalogue of questions they intend to answer and by describing the purpose of their work that they are focussing on the inner life of the firm and not on its boundaries (Jensen & Meckling, 1976, p. 306). Their objective is to fill the “black box” of the firm.
- 3.
Malone (2004) coined the idea of moving from command and control to a management of "cultivation and coordination".
References
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
Aoki, M., Gustafsson, B., & Williamson, O. E. (1990). Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. SAGE Publications.
Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica.
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). The theory of firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Harvard Business Review Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Reve, T. (1990). The firm as nexus of internal and external contracts. The firm as a nexus of treaties (pp. 133–161). London: SAGE Publications.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Williamson, O. E. (1978). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. In Information and Control.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Theurl, T., Meyer, E. (2019). Structuring the Boundaries of the Firm. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06234-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)