Skip to main content

Greedy Consensus Tree and Maximum Greedy Consensus Tree Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation (WALCOM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11355))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Consensus tree is a phylogenetic tree that summarizes the branching information of a set of conflicting phylogenetic trees. Computing consensus tree is a major step in phylogenetic tree reconstruction. It also finds application in predicting a species tree from a set of gene trees. Here, we focus our study on one of the most frequently used consensus tree problem, called greedy consensus tree problem. Given k phylogenetic trees leaf-labeled by n taxa, previous best known algorithm for constructing a greedy consensus tree of these k trees runs in \(O(k n^{1.5} \log n)\) time. Here, we describe an \(O(k^2 n)\)-time solution. Our method is the fastest when \(k = O(\sqrt{n} \log n)\).

Existing greedy consensus tree methods may not report the most resolved greedy consensus tree. Here, we propose a new computational problem called the maximum greedy consensus tree problem that aims to find the most resolved greedy consensus tree. We showed that this problem is NP-hard for \(k \ge 3\). We also give a polynomial time solution when \(k=2\) and an approximation algorithm for \(k=3\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams III, E.N.: Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Syst. Biol. 21(4), 390–397 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremer, K.: Combinable component consensus. Cladistics 6(4), 369–372 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryantm, D.: A classification of consensus methods for phylogenetics. In: Janowitz, M.F., Lapointe, F.-J., McMorris, F.R., Mirkin, B., Roberts, F.S. (eds.) Bioconsensus. DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 61, pp. 163–184. American Mathematical Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Day, W.H.E.: Optimal algorithms for comparing trees with labeled leaves. J. Classif. 2, 7–28 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Felsenstein, J.: Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Felsenstein, J.: PHYLIP, version 3.6. Software package, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gawrychowski, P., Landau, G.M., Sung, W.-K., Weimann, O.: A faster construction of greedy consensus trees. In: 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2018, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 63:1–63:14, 9–13 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jansson, J., Rajaby, R., Shen, C., Sung, W.-K.: Algorithms for the majority rule (+) consensus tree and the frequency difference consensus tree. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jansson, J., Shen, C., Sung, W.-K.: Fast algorithms for consensus trees (FACT) (2013). http://compbio.ddns.comp.nus.edu.sg/~consensus.tree

  10. Jansson, J., Shen, C., Sung, W.-K.: Improved algorithms for constructing consensus trees. J. ACM 63(3), 1–24 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jansson, J., Sung, W.-K., Vu, H., Yiu, S.-M.: Faster algorithms for computing the R* consensus tree. In: Ahn, H.-K., Shin, C.-S. (eds.) ISAAC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8889, pp. 414–425. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13075-0_33

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Margush, T., McMorris, F.R.: Consensus \(n\)-trees. Bull. Math. Biol. 43(2), 239–244 (1981)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips, C., Warnow, T.J.: The asymmetric median tree — a new model for building consensus trees. Discrete Appl. Math. 71(1–3), 311–335 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, C., Warnow, T.J.: The asymmetric median tree — a new model for building consensus trees. In: Hirschberg, D., Myers, G. (eds.) CPM 1996. LNCS, vol. 1075, pp. 234–252. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61258-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajaby, R., Sung, W.-K.: Computing asymmetric median tree of two trees via better bipartite matching algorithm. In: Brankovic, L., Ryan, J., Smyth, W.F. (eds.) IWOCA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10765, pp. 356–367. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78825-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P.: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12), 1572–1574 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J.: Taxonomic congruence in the Leptopodomorpha re-examined. Syst. Zool. 30(3), 309–325 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sung, W.-K.: Algorithms in Bioinformatics: A Practical Introduction. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Swofford, D.L.: PAUP*, Version 4.0. Software Package. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wing-Kin Sung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sung, WK. (2019). Greedy Consensus Tree and Maximum Greedy Consensus Tree Problems. In: Das, G., Mandal, P., Mukhopadhyaya, K., Nakano, Si. (eds) WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation. WALCOM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10564-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10564-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10563-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10564-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics