Skip to main content

Improving Cyber Situation Awareness by Building Trust in Analytics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019 (IHSI 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 903))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Analysts depend on technology to access and understand information, information that ultimately impacts their level of Cyber Situation Awareness (CyberSA). Adoption of advanced analytics, particularly those that generate risk scores or that depend on machine learning, can be impacted by a lack of trust in what the scores represent. Lack of trust in analytics can negatively impact CyberSA and efficient decision making, as analysts who do not trust outcomes from analytic models continue to search for information that confirms the analytic outcome, or continue to seek supplementary environmental information prior to making critical decisions. While human-driven investigative work is, and will remain, critical for security operations, delays in decision making, and increased efforts in information gathering, can negatively impact the efficiency of threat detection. Semi-structured interviews with analysts revealed five avenues for improving trust in analytics, including Context-Based, Case-Based, Model-Based, Ethics-Based, and Human-Centric AI Improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cisco Systems, Inc.: Annual cybersecurity report. Technical report (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forcepoint: The 2017 state of cybersecurity. Technical report (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Fact. 37, 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barford, P., et al.: Cyber SA: situational awareness for cyber defense. In: Jajodia, S., Liu, P., Swarup, V., Wang, C. (eds.) Advances in Information Security, vol. 46. Springer, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fylan, F.: Semi-structured interviewing. In: Miles, J., Gilbert, P. (eds.) A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical & Health Psychology, pp. 65–77. Oxford University, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kallio, H., Pietila, A., Johnson, M., Kangasniemi, M.: Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J. Adv. Nurse. 72, 2954–2965 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Cunningham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cunningham, M., Kular, D. (2019). Improving Cyber Situation Awareness by Building Trust in Analytics. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019. IHSI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 903. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics