Skip to main content

Mobile Technology Acceptance Model: An Empirical Study on Users’ Acceptance and Usage of Mobile Technology for Knowledge Providing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2018)

Abstract

In this study we applied the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explain users’ acceptance of mobile technology as a medium of knowledge providing. We adjusted the TAM by adding three new constructs: Access to Information, Information Quality, and Information Navigation. The model was tested on a population of 303 respondents using structural equation modeling (SEM). Our findings indicated that information quality and information navigation influence the perceived ease of use and, as a result, perceived usefulness of mobile technology usage that has an impact on the behavioral intention of use and the actual use of these devices. The developed model might comprise the basis for further research in the area of mobile technology usage for knowledge providing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alderete, M.V.: Mobile broadband: a key enabling technology for entrepreneurship? J. Small Bus. Manag. 55(2), 254–269 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alharbi, S., Drew, S.: Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 5(1), 143–155 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ally, M., Prieto-Blázquez, J.: What is the future of mobile learning in education? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 11(1), 142–151 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anand, P.R., Kumaran, M.: Information seeking behaviour of shrimp farmers and their perception towards technology dissemination through mobile phones. J. Ext. Educ. 29(1), 5787–5796 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barata, J., Da Cunha, P.R., Stal, J.: Mobile supply chain management in the Industry 4.0 era: an annotated bibliography and guide for future research. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31(1), 173–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2016-0156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brine, J.: Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: those that know and those that do not – the discourse of the European Union. Br. Educ. Res. J. 32(5), 649–665 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caudill, J.G.: The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: parallel developments. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 8(2), 1–13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davison, C.B., Lazaros, E.J.: Adopting mobile technology in the higher education classroom. J. Technol. Stud. 41(1), 30–39 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dearnley, C., et al.: Using mobile technologies for assessment and learning in practice settings: outcomes of five case studies. Int. J. E-Learn. 8(2), 193–207 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., Ross, M.: Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In higher education institutions. J. Online Learn. Teach. 11(2), 210–232 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foray, D., Lundvall, B.: The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Econ. Impact Knowl. 115–121 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. French, A.M., Guo, C., Shim, J.P.: Current status, issues, and future of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD). Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (CAIS) 35(10), 191–197 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., Nguyen, J.: Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Comput. Educ. 107, 91–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hussain, I., Adeeb, M.A.: Role of mobile technology in promoting campus-wide learning environment. TOJET: the Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 8(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Junglas, I., Abraham, C., Ives, B.: Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance. Decis. Support Syst. 46(3), 634–647 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaske, D., Mvena, Z.S.K., Sife, A.S.: Mobile phone usage for accessing agricultural information in Southern Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Inf. 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1371023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuciapski, M.: A model of mobile technologies acceptance for knowledge transfer by employees. J. Knowl. Manag. 21(5), 1053–1076 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lundvall, B.A., et al.: The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion. Edward Elgar Publishing, Glos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marangunić, N., Granić, A.: Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 81–95 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin, F., Ertzberger, J.: Here and now mobile learning: an experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Comput. Educ. 68, 76–85 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R.: Information on the go: a case study of Europeana mobile users. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(7), 1311–1322 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nord, J.H., Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J.: A report on the state of mobile technologies within organizations. Issues Inf. Syst. 17(1), 70–79 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Núñez, D., Ferrada, X., Neyem, A., Serpell, A., Sepúlveda, M.: A user-centered mobile cloud computing platform for improving knowledge management in small-to-medium enterprises in the Chilean construction industry. Appl. Sci. 8(4), 516 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Owczarek, M.: Analiza cen usług mobilnego dostępu do Internetu w Polsce. Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej, Warszawa (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Portela, F., da Veiga, A.M., Santos, M.F.: Benefits of bring your own device in healthcare. In: Machado, J., Abelha, A., Santos, M.F., Portela, F. (eds.) Next-Generation Mobile and Pervasive Healthcare Solutions, pp. 32–45. IGI Global, Hershey (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Prusak, L.: Knowledge in Organisations. Routledge, Abingdon (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Román, S., Rodríguez, R., Jaramillo, J.F.: Are mobile devices a blessing or a curse? Effects of mobile technology use on salesperson role stress and job satisfaction. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 33(5), 651–664 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rowles, D.: Mobile Marketing: How Mobile Technology is Revolutionizing Marketing, Communications and Advertising. Kogan Page Publishers, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roy, D.: Success factors of adoption of mobile applications in rural india: effect of service characteristics on conceptual model. In: Green Computing Strategies for Competitive Advantage and Business Sustainability, pp. 211–238. IGI Global, Hershey (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Mobile technology in knowledge acquisition: a preliminary study. In: Ulman, P., Węgrzyn, R., Wójtowicz, P. (eds.) Knowledge, Economy, Society: Challenges and Tools of Modern Finance and Information Technology, pp. 123–132. Cracow, Poland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Towards Integration of mobile technology and knowledge management in organizations: a preliminary study. In: Kowal, J. et al. (eds.) Innovations for Human Development in Transition Economies. Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT Management for Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies, Wrocław, Poland, pp. 204–214 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Why M-learning might appeal to organisations? In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V., Ghoneim, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, pp. 139–148. Cracow University of Economics, Kraków (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stal, J.: Data personalization in mobile environment: the content adaptation problem. In: Tvrdíková, M., Ministr, J., Rozehnal, P. (eds.). Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice, pp. 181–188. Technical University of Ostrava (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stal, J.: Information and application management: implications for mobile business development. Int. J. Strateg. Manag. Decis. Support Syst. Strateg. Manag. 15(4), 43–52 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu, J.H., Wang, S.C.: What drives mobile commerce?: an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 42(5), 719–729 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.G.: Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. J. Model. Manag. 2(3), 251–280 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janusz Stal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research has been financed by the funds granted to the Faculty of Management, Cracow University of Economics, Poland, within the subsidy for maintaining research potential.

Appendix

Appendix

Measurement items in the Survey Questionnaire

Constructs (latent variables)

Measurement items

Questions

Access to Information (AI)

AI1

In my opinion, the speed of mobile Internet is satisfactory

AI2

In my opinion, the availability of mobile Internet is satisfactory

AI3

In my opinion, the access cost to the mobile Internet is satisfactory

Information Quality (IQ)

IQ1

I think that content intended for smartphones is optimized for their correct display

IQ2

I think that content displayed on smartphones is tailored to the expectations of a mobile user

IQ3

I think that it is possible to effectively present any type of content on a smartphone

Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)

PEOU1

I think that it’s easy to use a smartphone

PEOU2

I think it would be easy for me to use a smartphone to get information

PEOU3

In general, I think that using a smartphone to get information would be easy

Information Navigation (IN)

IN1

I think that small dimensions of a smartphone do not constitute an obstacle to effective navigation of the displayed information

IN2

I think that the lack of a traditional keyboard or mouse is not an obstacle to effective navigation of the presented information

IN3

In general, I think that the technical parameters of a smartphone should not be an obstacle to getting acquainted with the presented content

Perceived Usefulness (PU)

PU1

I believe that using a smartphone to obtain information can speed up the implementation of tasks

PU2

I believe that using a smartphone to obtain information can improve my work efficiency

PU3

In general, I think that using a smartphone to get information can be useful in my work

Behavioral Intention (BI)

BI1

I intend to use a smartphone to retrieve information in the future

BI2

I intend to use a smartphone to get information as often as possible

BI3

I intend to use a smartphone to obtain information to support my work

Actual Use (AU)

AU1

I used a smartphone to get information during the last week

AU2

I used a smartphone to get information during the last month

AU3

In general, I use a smartphone to get information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G. (2019). Mobile Technology Acceptance Model: An Empirical Study on Users’ Acceptance and Usage of Mobile Technology for Knowledge Providing. In: Themistocleous, M., Rupino da Cunha, P. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11394-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11395-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics