Skip to main content

Potential for Improving Public Services by Exploring Citizens’ Communication to Public Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE 2018)

Abstract

While the purpose of public organizations is to serve citizens, the citizens themselves are not always consulted in order to develop better public services. We argue that the direct communication from citizens to public organizations contains a wealth of information on how the organizations could improve their services, and this information is worth exploring. In order to prove our argument, we have interviewed 19 public organizations in Rwanda and Sri Lanka, identified 26 issues raised by the citizens, and mapped these issues into four solution domains: availability and timeliness of information, policy development, business process development, availability and design of e-services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K.: Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Manag. Rev. 18(5), 639–653 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nambisan, S., Nambisan, P.: Engaging Citizens in Co-creation in Public Services: Lessons Learned and Best Practices. IBM Center for the Business of Government (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 446–454 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A., Strykowski, S.: Social government: a concept supporting communities in co-creation and co-production of public services. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 204–209. ACM, New York, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raikov, A.: Accelerating technology for self-organizing networked democracy. Futures (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sneiders, E., Byungura, J.C., Henkel, M., Perjons, E.: Potential of language technology to support public organizations and their communication channels in a developing country. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 236–244. ACM, New York, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ruthven, I., Kelly, D. (eds.): Interactive Information Seeking, Behavior and Retrieval. Facet Publishing, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pabarskaite, Z., Raudys, A.: A process of knowledge discovery from web log data: systematization and critical review. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 28(1), 79–104 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sneiders, E.: Review of the main approaches to automated email answering. New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. AISC, vol. 444, pp. 135–144. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P.A., Rose, G.M.: Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electron. Mark. 12(3), 157–162 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K., Tuch, A.N.: Designing usable web forms: empirical evaluation of web form improvement guidelines. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 1275–1284. ACM, New York, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Saarmann M.: Digital records keeping to information governance in Estonian local governments. In: Proceedings of i-Society 2012, pp. 199–204. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(5), 716–725 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scholl, H.J.: Interoperability in e-Government: more than just smart middleware. In: Proceedings of HICSS 2005, pp. 123–123. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boyne, G.A.: Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda. J. Public Admin. Res. Theor. 13(3), 367–394 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skelcher, C.: Public-private partnerships, pp. 347–370. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karnani, A.: Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230120235

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Crié, D.: Consumers’ complaint behavior: taxonomy, typology and determinants: Towards a unified ontology. J. Database Mark. Cust. Strat. Manag. 11(1), 60–79 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, S., Cude, B.J.: Consumer complaint channel choice in online and offline purchases. Int. J. Cons. Stud. 36(1), 90–96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meik, J., Brock, C., Blut, M.: Complaining customers as innovation contributors: stimulating service innovation through multichannel complaint management. In: Proceedings of SRII Global Conference 2014, pp. 125–132. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. CIA: The World Factbook. Sri Lanka. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ce.html. Accessed 02 May 2018

  22. Fields, G.S.: Working Hard, Working Poor: A Global Journey. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robbins, M.D., Simonsen, B., Feldman, B.: Citizens and resource allocation: improving decision making with interactive web-based citizen participation. Public Admin. Rev. 68(3), 564–575 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., Loukis, E.: Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Sæbø, Ø. (eds.) ePart 2012. LNCS, vol. 7444, pp. 156–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferro, E., Loukis, E.N., Charalabidis, Y., Osella, M.: Policy making 2.0: from theory to practice. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 359–368 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bekkers, V., Edwards, A., de Kool, D.: Social media monitoring: responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 335–342 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stamati, T., Papadopoulos, T., Anagnostopoulos, D.: Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: cases in the Greek context. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(1), 12–29 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamateri, E., et al.: A comparative analysis of tools and technologies for policy making. In: Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Deljoo, A. (eds.) Policy Practice and Digital Science. PAIT, vol. 10, pp. 125–156. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Mergel, I.: A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 327–334 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., Androutsopoulou, A.: Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 99–109 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Michels, A., De Graaf, L.: Examining citizen participation: local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Gov. Stud. 36(4), 477–491 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the people in Rwanda and Sri Lanka who made this research possible. Thanks a lot to Sri Lanka Institute of Development Administration, without you we would never reach those 12 organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eriks Sneiders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sneiders, E., Gunawardena, L., Rutabayiro Ngoga, S., Darayathna, R., Byungura, J.C. (2019). Potential for Improving Public Services by Exploring Citizens’ Communication to Public Organizations. In: Chugunov, A., Misnikov, Y., Roshchin, E., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13282-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13283-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics