Skip to main content

IoT-Based Automatic Non-conformity Detection: A Metalworking SME Use Case

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability VIII

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences ((IESACONF,volume 9))

Abstract

Industrial production’s main goal is to achieve adaptability, resource efficiency, as well as, to integrate the complete value and supply chains, including customers, in business and value processes. To this end, manufacturing systems need to be as generic as possible in order to answer the different needs of a variety of industries. Industry4.0 paradigm stands as the baseline to answer these requirements, and data collection capabilities represent a major pillar in this strategy. Moreover, the way companies interact and communicate, being able of sharing information among themselves as well as to take full advantage of the data and knowledge being generated (even within the same company) demand huge attention to solving interoperability issues. The C2NET project (Cloud Collaborative Manufacturing Networks project), intends to implement the Industry 4.0 vision aiming to provide a cloud-based platform for managing the company interactions and promoting enterprise interoperability. This paper presents how the Data Collection Framework (DCF) developed within C2NET project can be used to collect data and support an automatic non-conformity detection case in a Portuguese metalworking SME. The developed components are briefly described as well as the implemented use case. The results obtained are also presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bohuslava, J., Martin, J., & Igor, H. (2017). TCP/IP protocol utilisation in process of dynamic control of robotic cell according industry 4.0 concept. In 2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) (pp. 217–222).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghimire, S., Melo, R., Ferreira, J., Agostinho, C., & Goncalves, R. (2015). Continuous data collection framework for manufacturing industries. In Ciuciu I. et al. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops (vol. 9416). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Govindarajan, N., Ferrer B. R., Xu, X., Nieto, A., & Lastra, J. L. M. (2016) An approach for integrating legacy systems in the manufacturing industry. In 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 683–688).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). (2014). Internet of things: wireless sensor networks, White Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ETSI Technical Committee Machine-to-Machine communications. (2013). Machine-to-Machine communications (M2M); Functional architecture. Available at: http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102600_102699/102690/02.01.01_60/ts_102690v020101p.pdf.

  6. Musen, M. (1998). Domain ontologies in software engineering: use of protégé with the EON architecture. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37(4–5), 540–550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. (2011). Stanford’s protégé home page. Retrieved from http://protege.stanford.edu/.

  8. Ontopia. (2015). About Ontopia. Retrieved from Ontopia: http://www.ontopia.net/page.jsp?id=about.

  9. Dicheva, D., & Dichev, C. (2012). TM4L: creating and browsing educational topic maps. WinstonSalem State University.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andres, B., Sanchis, R., & Poler, R. (2016). A cloud platform to support collaboration in supply networks. International Journal of Production Management Engineering, 4(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lonsdale, J. (2012). What are some companies similar to Palantir Technologies in terms of challenge and work culture? October, 2012. Available at: https://www.quora.com/topic/Smart-Enterprises.

  12. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Special issue on communications, computers, and networks. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., & Westkämper, E. (2008). Smart factory-a step towards the next generation of manufacturing. In Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier (pp. 115–118). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westkämper, E., Jendoubi, L., Eissele, M., & Ertl, T. (2006). Smart factory—bridging the gap between digital planning and reality. Manufacturing Systems, 35(4), 307–314.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Agostinho, C., Marques-Lucena, C., Sesana, M., Felic, A., Fischer, K., Rubattino, C., & Sarraipa, J. (2015). OSmosis process development for innovative product design and validation. In 2015 ASME IMECE, Houston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ko, J., Lee, B., Lee, K., Hong, S. G., Kim, N., & Paek, J. (2015). Sensor virtualization module: virtualizing IoT devices on mobile smartphones for effective sensor data management. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/730762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IoT Open Platforms. Retrieved from http://open-platforms.eu/.

  18. Marques, M., Agostinho, C., Zacharewicz, G., & Jardim-Gonçalves, R. (2017). Decentralized decision support for intelligent manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 9(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-170436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karnouskos, S., Villaseñor-Herrera, V., Haroon, M., Handte, M., & Marrón P. J. (2011). Requirement considerations for ubiquitous integration of cooperating objects. In Proceedings of 2011 4th IFIP International Conference New Technology Mobile Security NTMS 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karnouskos, S. (2009). Efficient sensor data inclusion in enterprise services. Datenbank-Spektrum, 9(28), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tan, L., & Wang, N. (2010). Future internet: The internet of things. In 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE) (vol. 5, pp. V5-376-V5-380).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peng, T., & Xun, X. (2017). An interoperable energy consumption analysis system for CNC machining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union H2020 projects C2NET (FoF-01-2014—nr 636909) and BOOST 4.0 (ICT-15-2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Marques .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marques, M., Cunha, A., Mohammed, W.M., Jardim-Gonçalves, R., Agostinho, C. (2019). IoT-Based Automatic Non-conformity Detection: A Metalworking SME Use Case. In: Popplewell, K., Thoben, KD., Knothe, T., Poler, R. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VIII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13692-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13693-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics