Skip to main content

Empowering Product Co-creation Approaches Through Business Interoperability Concepts: The Toy Industry Case

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability VIII

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences ((IESACONF,volume 9))

Abstract

Although 99% of toy manufacturing companies are SMEs, the toy market is dominated by a limited number of massive global brands. Therefore, SMEs should enhance their current business model in a way that would give them a competitive advantage. This paper presents work from the European-funded research project ToyLabs that aims to build on this identified need to establish a new, collaborative value chain for product development in the toy industry, with business interoperability playing a key role in this quest. The methodology engages toy manufacturers, FabLabs, toy safety experts and end customers in the product design workflow to create new, safe customer-centred and market-targeted toys that are ready to be certified and put into production. For achieving the goals of this approach, the methodology behind the ToyLabs platform focuses on the incorporation of cross-sectorial business process interoperability capabilities that aim to create a common vocabulary, understanding and a communication gateway for the identification of potential partners even from sectors that were previously unrelated to the toy industry and the exchange of requirements and specifications between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ECSIP consortium: study on the competitiveness of the toy industry—final report (2013). (pp. 36–38). https://doi.org/10.2762/56910.

  2. Toy & Game Manufacturing Report Summary. http://www.hoovers.com/industry-facts.toy-game-manufacturing.1207.html.

  3. Legner, C., Wende, K. (2006). Towards an excellence framework for business interoperability. In 19th Bled eConference eValues - Conference Proceedings, (pp. 1–16).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyt, J., & Huq, F. (2000). From arms-length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain. An evolutionary process. International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 30, 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010351453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, Q., Kauffman, R. J. (2001). Business models for Internet-based e-procurement systems and B2B electronic markets: an exploratory assessment. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society (p. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsagkani, C. (2005). Inter-organizational collaboration on the process layer. In Proceedings IFIP/ACM SIGAPP INTEROP-ESA Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning Control, 22, 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.536619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vincent, Wang X., & Xu, X. W. (2013). An interoperable solution for Cloud manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacture, 29, 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCIM.2013.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galambos, P., Csapó, Á., Zentay, P., Fülöp, I. M., Haidegger, T., Baranyi, P., et al. (2015). Design, programming and orchestration of heterogeneous manufacturing systems through VR-powered remote collaboration. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacture, 33, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, H. K., & Harding, J. A. (2007). A manufacturing system engineering ontology model on the semantic web for inter-enterprise collaboration. Computers in Industry, 58, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. European Commission: the new european interoperability framework. https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/eif_en.

  14. Markaki, O., Kokkinakos, P., Panopoulos, D., Koussouris, S., Askounis, D. (2013). Benefits and risks in dynamic manufacturing networks. Presented at the (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zacharewicz, G., Diallo, S., Ducq, Y., Agostinho, C., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Bazoun, H., et al. (2017). Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: state of the art and future challenges. Information System E-bus. Management, 15, 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0317-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papazoglou, M. P., van den Heuvel, W.-J., & Mascolo, J. E. (2015). A reference architecture and knowledge-based structures for smart manufacturing networks. IEEE Software, 32, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R., et al. (2016). Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in Industry, 79, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Viswanadham, N., & Gaonkar, R. S. (2003). Partner selection and synchronized planning in dynamic manufacturing networks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRA.2002.805659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ISTQB (2015). What is V-model- advantages, disadvantages and when to use it? ISTQB Exam.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lampathaki, F., Panopoulos, D., Kokkinakos, P., Bompa, C., Koussouris, S., Askounis, D. (2014). Infusing verification and validation in ICT solutions in manufacturing: The FITMAN V&V Method. In Enterprise interoperability VI. (pp. 307–317). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira, Jose, de Beca, M. F., Agostinho, C., Nunez, M. J., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2013). Standard blueprints for interoperability in Factories of the Future (FoF). IFAC Proceedings, 46, 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been co-funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the ToyLabs project, grant agreement No. 732559.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Michalitsi-Psarrou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michalitsi-Psarrou, A. et al. (2019). Empowering Product Co-creation Approaches Through Business Interoperability Concepts: The Toy Industry Case. In: Popplewell, K., Thoben, KD., Knothe, T., Poler, R. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VIII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13692-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13693-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics