Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Partnering for Digital Innovation: A Competence-Based Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Services and Platforms. Considerations for Sourcing (Global Sourcing 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 344))

  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing on the attention-based view of the firm and research on microfoundations of organizational capabilities, we develop and empirically analyze a theoretical model that examines the role of cognition of IT leadership in achieving organizational-level digital maturity and the mechanisms through which it affects the innovative outcomes of the exploration-focused outsourcing projects. We find that Chief Information Officers’ (CIOs) internal beliefs regarding the importance of capabilities for the IT function seem to not directly affect the innovation outcomes of third-party collaborations. Instead, this relationship is mediated by the degree of digital maturity the company has managed to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, and Will, Alexander (2005). SmartPLS 2.0.M3. Hamburg: SmartPLS, http://www.smartpls.de.

  2. 2.

    We have used the bootstrapping procedure proposed in [62] to verify whether the mediation effect of digital maturity is statistically significant. Differently from the traditional four-step procedure [63] that necessarily requires the direct path between independent and dependent variables to be significant, bootstrapping procedure relaxes this assumption. Instead, the bootstrapping procedure requires generating a large number of samples with replacement and estimating indirect effect for each sample. The obtained values were then ranked from highest to lowest and confidence intervals were calculated – as the confidence interval excluded zero, we were able to conclude that the observed indirect effect is significant [62].

References

  1. Pavlou, P.A., El Sawy, O.A.: The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(3), 443–471 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M.: Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55(2), 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weill, P., Woerner, S.L.: The future of the CIO in a digital economy. MIS Q. Executive 12(2), 65–75 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feeny, D.F., Willcocks, L.P.: Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Manag. Rev. 39(3), 9 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., Venkatraman, N.V.: Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q. 37(2), 471–482 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, S.P.J., Straub, D.W., Liang, T.P.: How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: insights from a matched survey of business and it managers. MIS Q. 39(2), 497–518 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weeks, M.R., Feeny, D.: Outsourcing: from cost management to innovation and business value. Calif. Manag. Rev. 50(4), 127–146 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Beyond cost savings: outsourcing business processes for innovation. Sloan Manag. Rev. 54(3), 63–69 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., Gerbasi, A.: Strategic innovation through outsourcing: the role of relational and contractual governance. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 203–216 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aubert, B.A., Kishore, R., Iriyama, A.: Exploring and managing the “innovation through outsourcing” paradox. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(4), 255–269 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ocasio, W.: Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(S1), 187–206 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ocasio, W.: Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5), 1286–1296 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gary, M.S., Wood, R.E., Pillinger, T.: Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making. Strateg. Manag. J. 33(11), 1229–1246 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gary, M.S., Wood, R.E.: Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strateg. Manag. J. 32(6), 569–594 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tripsas, M., Gavetti, G.: Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strateg. Manag. J. 21(10–11), 1147–1161 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, vol. 2, pp. 169–187. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd, D.A., Mcmullen, J.S., Ocasio, W.: Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strateg. Manag. J. 38(3), 626–644 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L.: Managerial response to changing environments: perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Adm. Sci. Q. 27, 548–570 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vuori, T.O., Huy, Q.N.: Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: how Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Adm. Sci. Q. 61(1), 9–51 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lucas Jr., H.C., Goh, J.M.: Disruptive technology: how Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 46–55 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eggers, J.P., Kaplan, S.: Cognition and renewal: comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2), 461–477 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., Song, M.: Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q. 41(1), 223–238 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D., Buckley, N.: Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 14, 1–25 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tumbas, S., Berente, N., vom Brocke, J.: Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. J. Inf. Technol. 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boynton, A.C., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology planning in the 1990’s: directions for practice and research. MIS Q. 12, 59–71 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sobol, M.G., Klein, G.: Relation of CIO background, IT infrastructure, and economic performance. Inf. Manag. 46(5), 271–278 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aral, S., Weill, P.: IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5), 763–780 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tippins, M.J., Sohi, R.S.: IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strateg. Manag. J. 24(8), 745–761 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malladi, S., Krishnan, M.S.: Cloud computing adoption and its implications for CIO strategic focus–an empirical analysis. In: Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Saldanha, T., Krishnan, M.: Leveraging IT for business innovation: does the role of the CIO matter? (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., Oshri, I.: Customer co-creation and exploration of emerging technologies: the mediating role of managerial attention and initiatives. Long Range Plan. 50(2), 221–242 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oshri, I., Arkhipova, D., Vaia, G.: Exploring the effect of familiarity and advisory services on innovation outcomes in outsourcing settings. J. Inf. Technol. 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bassellier, G., Benbasat, I.: Business competence of information technology professionals: conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships. MIS Q. 28, 673–694 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heart, T., Maoz, H., Pliskin, N.: From governance to adaptability: the mediating effect of IT executives’ managerial capabilities. Inf. Syst. Manag. 27(1), 42–60 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, D.Q., Preston, D.S., Xia, W.: Antecedents and effects of CIO supply-side and demand-side leadership: a staged maturity model. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 231–272 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., Lindgren, R.: Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q. 41(1), 239–253 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jansen, J.J., Van Den Bosch, F.A., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52(11), 1661–1674 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rothaermel, F.T., Deeds, D.L.: Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strateg. Manag. J. 25(3), 201–221 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chesbrough, H.: The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. Calif. Manag. Rev. 45(3), 33–58 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Parmigiani, A., Mitchell, W.: Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within-firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strateg. Manag. J. 30(10), 1065–1091 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Capron, L., Mitchell, W.: Selection capability: how capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ. Sci. 20(2), 294–312 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 383–397 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. In: Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy, pp. 39–67 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hoang, H.A., Rothaermel, F.T.: Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(7), 734–758 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Grigoriou, K., Rothaermel, F.T.: Organizing for knowledge generation: internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strateg. Manag. J. 38(2), 395–414 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 724–735 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yoo, Y., Boland Jr., R.J., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A.: Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1398–1408 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Corso, M., Giovannetti, G., Guglielmi, L., Vaia, G.: Conceiving and implementing the digital organization. In: Bongiorno, G., Rizzo, D., Vaia, G. (eds.) CIOs and the Digital Transformation, pp. 181–203. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31026-8_10

    Google Scholar 

  50. Arkhipova, D., Vaia, G., DeLone, W., Braghin, C.: IT Governance in the Digital Era (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Preston, D.S., Chen, D., Leidner, D.E.: Examining the antecedents and consequences of CIO strategic decision-making authority: an empirical study. Decis. Sci. 39(4), 605–642 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kaltenecker, N., Hess, T., Huesig, S.: Managing potentially disruptive innovations in software companies: transforming from on-premises to the on-demand. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(4), 234–250 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee, G., Xia, W.: Toward agile: an integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Q. 34(1), 87–114 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Catlin, T., Scanlan, J., Willmott, P.: Raising your digital quotient. McKinsey Q. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Westerman, G., Tannou, M., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A.: The digital advantage: how digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry, pp. 2–23. MIT Sloan Management and Capgemini Consulting, Massachusetts (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kane, G.C.: Digital maturity, not digital transformation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 14, 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2), 295–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theor. Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Podsakoff, N.P.: Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Q. 35(2), 293–334 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  62. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Williams, J.: Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar. Behav. Res. 39(1), 99–128 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rothaermel, F.T., Alexandre, M.T.: Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 20(4), 759–780 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, San Giobbe 873, Cannaregio, 30121, Venice, Italy

    Daria Arkhipova & Giovanni Vaia

Authors
  1. Daria Arkhipova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Vaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daria Arkhipova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Julia Kotlarsky

  2. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Ilan Oshri

  3. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Leslie Willcocks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arkhipova, D., Vaia, G. (2019). Partnering for Digital Innovation: A Competence-Based Study. In: Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I., Willcocks, L. (eds) Digital Services and Platforms. Considerations for Sourcing. Global Sourcing 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 344. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15850-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15850-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15849-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15850-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics