Skip to main content

A Study over NoSQL Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'19 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 930))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Large amounts of data (BigData) are nowadays stored using NoSQL databases and typically stored and accessed using a key-value format. However, depending on the NoSQL database type, different performance is offered. Thus, in this paper, NoSQL database performance is evaluated and compared in aspects relating with, query performance, based on reads and updates.

In this paper, the five most popular NoSQL databases are tested and evaluated: MongoDB; Cassandra; HBase; OrientDB; Voldemort; Memcached and Redis. To assess the mentioned databases, are used, workloads represented by Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark.

Results allow users to choose the NoSQL database that better fits application needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carro, M.: NoSQL databases (2014). arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.2101

  2. Chang, F., Dean, J., Ghemawat, S., Hsieh, W.C., Wallach, D.A., Burrows, M., Chandra, T., Fikes, A., Gruber, R.E.: Bigtable: a distributed storage system for structured data. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 26(2), 4 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, J.D.: Acid versus base for database transactions. Cook, J.D., Blog (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., Sears, R.: Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 143–154. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeCandia, G., Hastorun, D., Jampani, M., Kakulapati, G., Lakshman, A., Pilchin, A., Sivasubramanian, S., Vosshall, P., Vogels, W.: Dynamo: amazon’s highly available key-value store. In: ACM SIGOPS operating systems review, vol. 41, pp. 205–220. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elbushra, M.M., Lindström, J.: Eventual consistent databases: state of the art. Open J. Databases (OJDB) 1(1), 26–41 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gajendran, S.K.: A survey on NoSQL databases. University of Illinois (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Han, J., Haihong, E., Le, G., Du, J.: Survey on NoSQL database. In: 2011 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications (ICPCA), pp. 363–366. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hecht, R., Jablonski, S.: NoSQL evaluation: a use case oriented survey. In: 2011 International Conference on Cloud and Service Computing (CSC), pp. 336–341. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Indrawan-Santiago, M.: Database research: are we at a crossroad? reflection on NoSQL. In: 2012 15th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), pp. 45–51. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leavitt, N.: Will NoSQL databases live up to their promise? Computer 43(2), 12–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moniruzzaman, A., Hossain, S.A.: NoSQL database: new era of databases for big data analytics-classification, characteristics and comparison (2013). arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.0191

  13. Pritchett, D.: Base: an acid alternative. Queue 6(3), 48–55 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon, S.: Brewer’s Cap Theorem. CS341 Distributed Information Systems, University of Basel (HS2012) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stonebraker, M.: SQL databases v. NoSQL databases. Commun. ACM 53(4), 10–11 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H., Tompa, F.W.: Querying xml documents by dynamic shredding. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 21–30. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

“This article is a result of the CityAction project CENTRO-01-0247-FEDER-017711, supported by Centro Portugal Regional Operational Program (CENTRO 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and also financed by national funds through FCT Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., under the project UID/Multi/04016/2016. Furthermore, we would like to thank the Instituto Politécnico de Viseu for their support.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe Sá .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martins, P., Abbasi, M., Sá, F. (2019). A Study over NoSQL Performance. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'19 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 930. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics