Skip to main content

Quantitative Comparison of White Matter Segmentation for Brain MR Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Vision (CVC 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 943))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2632 Accesses

Abstract

The volume of white matter in brain MR image is important for medical diagnosis, therefore, it is critical to obtain an accurate segmentation of the white matter. We compare quantitatively the up-to-date versions of three software packages: SPM, FSL, and FreeSurfer, for brain MR image segmentation, and then select the package that performs the best for white matter segmentation. Dice index (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and modified Hausdorff distance (MHD) are chosen as the metrics for comparison. A new computational method is also proposed to calculate HD and MHD efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The FIL Methods Group: Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  2. Analysis Group: FMRIB Software Library (FSL). http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  3. Laboratory for Computational Neuroimaging: FreeSurfer. http://freesurfer.net. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  4. Klauschen, F., Goldman, A., Barra, V., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Lundervold, A.: Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1310–1327 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazemi, K., Noorizadeh, N.: Quantitative comparison of SPM, FSL, and brainsuite for brain MR image segmentation. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 4(1), 13 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kwan, R.K.-S., Evans, A.C., Pike, G.B.: MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(11), 1085–1097 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. BrainWeb: Simulated Brain Database: McConnell Brain Imaging Centre. http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/brainweb/. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  8. Besl, P.J., McKay, N.D.: A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14(2), 239–256 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubuisson, M.-P., Jain, A.K.: A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 566-568 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taha, A.A., Hanbury, A.: Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imaging 2015, 15–29 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M., Kikinis, R., Warfield, S.K.: Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Stat Med. 23(8), 1259–1282 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Babalola, K.O., Patenaude, B., Aljabar, P., Schnabel, J., Kennedy, D., Crum, W., Smith, S., Cootes, T.F., Jenkinson, M., Rueckert, D.: Comparison and evaluation of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures in brain MRI. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 11(Pt 1), pp. 409–416 (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardenes, R., de Luis-Garcia, R., Bach-Cuadra, M.A.: A multidimensional segmentation evaluation for medical image data. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 96(2), 108–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morain-Nicolier, F., Lebonvallet, S., Baudrier, E., Ruan, S.: Hausdorff distance based 3D quantification of brain tumor evolution from MRI images. In: Conference Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 2007, pp. 5597–5600 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Narendran, P., Narendira Kumar, V.K., Somasundaram, K.: 3D brain tumors and internal brain structures segmentation in MR images. Int. J. Image Graph. Sig. Process. 2012(1), 35–43 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chui, H., Rangarajan, A.: A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 89(2), 114–141 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, C., Shi, W., Deng, Y.: A new Hausdorff distance for image matching. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 26, 581–586 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taha, A.A., Hanbury, A.: An efficient algorithm for calculating the exact Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37(11), 2153–2163 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianping Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, X., Martinez, J. (2020). Quantitative Comparison of White Matter Segmentation for Brain MR Images. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S. (eds) Advances in Computer Vision. CVC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 943. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics