Skip to main content

A Reliable Method to Remove Batch Effects Maintaining Group Differences in Lymphoma Methylation Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2019)

Abstract

The amount of biological data is increasing and their analysis is becoming one of the most challenging topics in the information sciences. Before starting the analysis it is important to remove unwanted variability due to some factors such as: year of sequencing, laboratory conditions and use of different protocols. This is a crucial step because if the variability is not evaluated before starting the analysis of interest, the results may be undesirable and the conclusion can not be true. The literature suggests to use some valid mathematical models, but experience shows that applying these to high-throughput data with a non-uniform study design is not straightforward and in many cases it may introduce a false signal. Therefore it is necessary to develop models that allow to remove the effects that can negatively influence the study preserving biological meaning. In this paper we report a new case study related lymphoma methylation data and we propose a suitable pipeline for its analysis.

G. Pontali and L. Cascione—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bioconductor repository provides tools for analysis and comprehension of high-throughput genomic data. It has 1560 software packages. The current release of Bioconductor is version 3.7.

  2. 2.

    Single-stranded fragments of DNA that are complementary to a gene.

  3. 3.

    Pertaining to a chromosome that is not a sex chromosome.

References

  1. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/minfi/versions/1.18.4/topics/preprocessQuantile

  2. Aryee, M., et al.: Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Biostatistics 30(10), 1363–1369 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benito, M., et al.: Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases. Bioinformatics 20(1), 105–114 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertoni, F., Rossi, D., Zucca, E.: Recent advances in understanding the biology of marginal zone lymphoma. F1000Research 7(406) (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y., et al.: Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the illumina infinium humanmethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8(2), 203–209 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hicks, S., Okrah, K., Paulson, J., Quackenbush, J., Irizarry, R., Bravo, H.: Smooth quantile normalization. Biostatistics 19(2), 185–198 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, W., Cheng, L., Rabinovic, A.: Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical bayes methods. Biostatistics 8(1), 118–127 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazar, C., et al.: Batch effect removal methods for microarray gene expression data integration: a survey. Brief. Bioinform. 14(4), 469–490 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, J., et al.: A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data. Pharmacogenomics 10(4), 278–291 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin-Subero, J., et al.: A comprehensive microarray-based DNA methylation study of 367 hematological neoplasms. PLoS One 4(9), e6986 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy, N., et al.: Meta-analysis of human methylation data for evidence of sex-specific autosomal patterns. BMC Genomics 15(1), 981 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nueda, M.J., Ferrer, A., Conesa, A.: ARSyN: a method for the identification and removal of systematic noise in multifactorial time course microarray experiments. Biostatistics 13(3), 553–566 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nygaard, V., Rødland, E., Hovig, E.: Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses. Biostatistics 17(1), 29–39 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourhoseingholi, M., Baghestani, A., Vahedi, M.: How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 5(2), 79–83 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rinaldi, A., et al.: Genome-wide dna profiling of marginal zone lymphomas identifies subtype-specific lesions with an impact on the clinical outcome. Blood 117(5), 1595–1604 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smyth, G., Speed, T.: Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 31(4), 265–273 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spina, V., et al.: The genetics of nodal marginal zone lymphoma. Blood 128(10), 1362–1373 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Z., et al.: Batch effect correction for genome-wide methylation data with illumina infinium platform. BMC Med. Genomics 4, 84 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swerdlow, S., et al.: WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yixue, L., Luonan, C.: Big biological data: challenges and opportunities. Genomics Proteomics Bioinform. 12(5), 187–189 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the following projects: GNCS-INDAM, Fondo Sociale Europeo, and National Research Council Flagship Projects Interomics. This work has been partially supported by the project of the Italian Ministry of education, Universities and Research (MIUR) “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022".

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Giulia Pontali , Luciano Cascione , Alberto J. Arribas , Andrea Rinaldi , Francesco Bertoni or Rosalba Giugno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pontali, G., Cascione, L., Arribas, A.J., Rinaldi, A., Bertoni, F., Giugno, R. (2019). A Reliable Method to Remove Batch Effects Maintaining Group Differences in Lymphoma Methylation Case Study. In: Rojas, I., Valenzuela, O., Rojas, F., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11466. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17935-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17935-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17934-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17935-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics