Skip to main content

Exploiting Symmetry of Independence in d-Separation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11489))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2531 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we exploit the symmetry of independence in the implementation of d-separation. We show that it can matter whether the search is conducted from start to goal or vice versa. Analysis reveals it is preferable to approach observed v-structure nodes from the bottom. Hence, a measure, called depth, is suggested to decide whether the search should run from start to goal or from goal to start. One salient feature is that depth can be computed during a pruning optimization step widely implemented. An empirical comparison is conducted against a clever implementation of d-separation. The experimental results are promising in two aspects. The effectiveness of our method increases with network size, as well as with the amount of observed evidence, culminating with an average time savings of 9% in the 9 largest BNs used in our experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Darwiche, A.: Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawid, A.P.: Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 41, 1–31 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Geiger, D., Verma, T.S., Pearl, J.: d-separation: from theorems to algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 139–148 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Holte, R.C., Felner, A., Sharon, G., Sturtevant, N.R., Chen, J.: MM: a bidirectional search algorithm that is guaranteed to meet in the middle. Artif. Intell. 252, 232–266 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauritzen, S.L., Dawid, A.P., Larsen, B.N., Leimer, H.G.: Independence properties of directed Markov fields. Networks 20, 491–505 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Madsen, A.L., Jensen, F.V.: Lazy propagation: a junction tree inference algorithm based on lazy evaluation. Artif. Intell. 113(1–2), 203–245 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohan, K., Pearl, J.: On the testability of models with missing data. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neapolitan, R.E.: Probabilistic Methods for Bioinformatics: With an Introduction to Bayesian Networks. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nobandegani, A.S., Psaromiligkos, I.N.: A rational distributed process-level account of independence judgment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10186 (2018)

  12. Pearl, J.: Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks. Artif. Intell. 29, 241–288 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: Belief networks revisited. Artif. Intell. 59, 49–56 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearl, J., Bareinboim, E.: External validity: from do-calculus to transportability across populations. Stat. Sci. 29(4), 579–595 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shachter, R.D.: Bayes-ball: the rational pastime (for determining irrelevance and requisite information in belief networks and influence diagrams). In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 480–487. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shipley, B.: Cause and Correlation in Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cory J. Butz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Butz, C.J., dos Santos, A.E., Oliveira, J.S., Madsen, A.L. (2019). Exploiting Symmetry of Independence in d-Separation. In: Meurs, MJ., Rudzicz, F. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18304-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18305-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics