Skip to main content

Semantic Roles: Towards Rhetorical Moves in Writing About Experimental Procedures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11489))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Scholarly writing in the experimental biomedical sciences follows the IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) structure. Many Biomedical Natural Language Processing tasks take advantage of this structure. The task of interest in this paper is the identification of semantic roles of procedural verbs as a first step toward identifying rhetorical moves, text segments that are rhetorical and perform specific communicative goals, in the Methods section. Based on a descriptive taxonomy of rhetorical moves structured around IMRaD, the foundational linguistic knowledge needed for a computationally feasible model of the rhetorical moves is described: semantic roles. Using the observation that the structure of scholarly writing in the laboratory-based experimental sciences closely follows the laboratory procedures, we focus on the procedural verbs in the Methods section. Our goal is to provide FrameNet and VerbNet-like information for the specialized domain of biochemistry. This paper presents the semantic roles required to achieve this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Experimental articles in the biomedical sciences normally organized in the IMRaD style: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.

  2. 2.

    https://gate.ac.uk/.

References

  1. Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, vol. 1, pp. 86–90 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biber, D.: Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics and the nature of language*. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 280(1), 20–32 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, N.: Towards creation of a corpus for argumentation mining the biomedical genetics research literature. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 11–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, N.L.: Identifying argumentation schemes in genetics research articles. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Argumentation mining, North American Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), Denver, CO, USA, pp. 12–21 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanoksilapatham, B.: A corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: Linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, USA (2003). http://202.28.199.34/multim/3107368.pdf

  8. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McHugh, M.L.: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. Biochem. Med. 22(3), 276–282 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mizuta, Y., Korhonen, A., Mullen, T., Collier, N.: Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(6), 468–487 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., Kingsbury, P.: The proposition bank: an annotated corpus of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist. 31(1), 71–106 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuler, K.K.: VerbNet: a broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon, Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2005). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1104493

  13. Swales, J.: Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teufel, S., Carletta, J., Moens, M.: An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 110–117 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teufel, S.: The Structure of Scientific Articles: Applications to Citation Indexing and Summarization. Center for the Study of Language and Information (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, P., et al.: Building a bio-event annotated corpus for the acquisition of semantic frames from biomedical corpora. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Marrakech, Morocco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, P., Nawaz, R., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S.: Enriching a biomedical event corpus with meta-knowledge annotation. BMC Bioinform. 12, 393 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Alliheedi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alliheedi, M., Mercer, R.E. (2019). Semantic Roles: Towards Rhetorical Moves in Writing About Experimental Procedures. In: Meurs, MJ., Rudzicz, F. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18305-9_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18304-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18305-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics