Abstract
The OER movement strives to support quality education being inclusive, equitable, open and participatory. Nevertheless, people with disabilities are still hindered from taking advantage of OER because of issues related to accessibility and usability in OER environments. Frequently, accessibility has not been wholly ensured, both in the website interface and in educational resources, and usability considerations have often excluded the specific needs of people with disabilities. We propose an architecture design for the OER environment guided by the concept of accessible user experience (aUX) that enhance accessibility and usability for a user disability profile. This design produces an adaptive response from the web interface that facilitates perception, understanding, navigation, and operation. Finally, to improve the meaning of information in search results for OER on the Web, we propose the embedded markup through a set of descriptors that can be interpreted by major search engines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkins, D., Brown, J.S., Hammond, A.L.: A review of the Open Educational Resources: Achievement, Challenges and New Opportunities. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Menlo Park (2007)
Navarrete, R., Luján-Mora, S.: Evaluating accessibility of open educational resource website with an heuristic method. In: 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (ITHED), pp. 6402–6412. IEEE (2015)
The Paciello Group: Accessible User Experience and W3C-WAI. https://developer.paciellogroup.com/blog/2013/06/accessible-user-experience-and-w3c-wai/
Navarrete, R., Luján-Mora, S.: Improving OER for learners with disabilities. In: 13th Web for All Conference (W4A 2016), pp. 16.1–16.2. ACM (2016)
W3C: HTML Microdata. https://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/
Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), pp. 719–728. IEEE (2009)
Hobbs, J., Fenn, T., Resmini, A.: Maturing a practice. J. Inf. Arch. 2(1), 37–54 (2010)
Garrett, J.J.: The Elements of User Experience: User Centered Design for the Web, 2nd revised edn. New Riders (2011)
Tokkonen, H., Saariluoma, P.: How user experience is understood? In: Science and Information Conference (SAI 2013), pp. 791–795. IEEE (2013)
Fenn, T., Hobbs, J.: The information architecture of meaning making. In: Reframing Information Architecture. Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 11–30. Springer (2014)
Aizpurua, A., Harper, S., Vigo, M.: Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experience. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Sudies 91, 13–23 (2016)
WHO Disabilities (2018). https://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/
W3C: Introduction to Web Accessibility. http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility
W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
ISO 9241-151:2008: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 151: Guidance on World Wide Web user interfaces (2008). https://www.iso.org/standard/37031.html
Navarrete, R., Luján-Mora, S.: Evaluating findability of open educational resources from the perspective of users with disabilities: a preliminary approach. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG 2015), pp. 112–119. IEEE (2015)
IEEE: 1484.12.1-2002 - IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1032843
IMS: Access for All v3.0 Public Draft Specification. http://www.imsglobal.org/activity/accessibility
LRMI Version 1.1. http://lrmi.dublincore.org/specifications/lrmi_1/
Schema.org. http://schema.org/
Kelly, B., Nevile, L., Sloan, D., Fanou, S., Ellison, R., Herrod, L.: From web accessibility to web adaptability. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 4, 212–226 (2009)
LSA: What is Sign Language? http://www.linguisticsociety.org/content/what-sign-language
Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: Good fonts for dyslexia. In: 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2013), pp. 14:1–14:8. ACM (2013)
Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., Baeza-Yates, R.: Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In: International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, pp. 36:1–36:9. ACM (2012)
Haas, K., Mika, P., Tarjan, P., Blanco, R.: Enhanced results for web search. In: 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 725–734. ACM (2011)
Google Search. http://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/mark-up-content
Meusel, R., Bizer, C., Paulheim, H.: A web-scale study of the adoption and evolution of the schema.org vocabulary over time. In: 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS 2015), pp. 15:1–15:11. ACM (2015)
Rajabi, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sanchez-Alonso, S.: Interlinking educational resources to web of data through IEEE LOM. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 12(1), 233–255 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Navarrete, R., Peñafiel, M., Tenemaza, M., Luján-Mora, S. (2020). Towards an Accessible UX for People with Disabilities in Open Educational Resources Websites. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19134-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19135-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)