Skip to main content

Method for Railway Timetable Evaluation in Terms of Random Infrastructure Load

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering in Dependability of Computer Systems and Networks (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2019)

Abstract

The traffic schedule is planned to keep distances between trains which allow a conflict-free train operation. For this reason the load of the power supply system is distributed in time. In consequence, the power limit is not exceeded. After unwanted event occurring, the traffic structure may change in such a way that an accumulation of section load can occur. As a result, the power limit can be exceeded and the electricity system may be damaged. Therefore, the main goal of the paper is to elaborate a method for railway timetable evaluation due to random power infrastructure load, caused by undesirable events. To reach the goal, a literature review was performed in terms of timetable evaluation, buffer times, undesirable events, system resilience and robustness. A method based on transportation mean movement theory with probability issues was proposed. The method was verified on a timetable for a selected railway line in Poland. Tractive calculations in terms of the electric power consumption were carried out. Using the method, critical situations were identified and changes were proposed. The paper ends with a discussion of the method and further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersson, E., Peterson, A., Krasemann, T.J.: Quantifying railway timetable robustness in critical points. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag. 3, 95–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attachment to Resolution of 16 July 2018 No. 566/2018, PKP Polish Railway Lines

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burggraeve, S., Bull, S.H., Vansteenwegen, P., Lusby, R.M.: Integrating robust timetabling in line plan optimization for railway systems. Transp. Res. Part C 77, 134–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burggraeve, S., Vansteenwegen, P.: Robust routing and timetabling in complex railway stations. Transp. Res. Part B 101, 228–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao, L., Jinjin, T., Leishan, Z., Yixiang, Y., Zhitong, H.: Improving recovery to optimality robustness through efficiency-balanced design of timetable structure. Transp. Res. Part C 85, 184–210 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guze, S.: Business availability indicators of critical infrastructures related to the climate-weather change. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Contemporary Complex Systems and Their Dependability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 761. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91446-6_24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guze, S.: An application of the selected graph theory domination concepts to transportation networks modelling. Sci. J. Marit. Univ. Szczecin 52(124), 97–102 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghaemia, N., Zilko, A., Yan, F., Cats, O., Kurowicka, D., Goverde, R.: Impact of railway disruption predictions and rescheduling on passenger delays. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag. 8, 103–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kierzkowski, A., Kisiel, T.: A model of check-in system management to reduce the security checkpoint variability. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 74, 80–98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2017.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kierzkowski, A., Kisiel, T.: Simulation model of security control system functioning: a case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal. J. Air Transp. Manag. Part B 64, 173–185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kroon, L.G., Dekker, R., Vromans, M.J.C.M.: Cyclic railway timetabling: a stochastic optimization approach. In: Algorithmic Methods for Railway Optimization, vol. 4359, pp. 41–66. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74247-0_2

  12. Kwaśnikowski, J.: Elementy teorii ruchu i racjonalizacja prowadzenia pociągu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Technologii Eksploatacji, Radom (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lusby, R., Larsen, J., Bull, S.: A survey on robustness in railway planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.044

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Madej, J.: Teoria ruchu pojazdów szynowych. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Podoski, J., Kacprzak, J., Mysłek, J.: Zasady Trakcji Elektrycznej. Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności, Warszawa (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salido, M.A., Barber, F., Ingolotti, L.: Robustness in railway transportation scheduling. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Chongqing, China, pp. 2880–2885 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcica.2008.4594481

  17. Skupień, E., Tubis, A.: The use of linguistic variables and the FMEA analysis in risk assessment in inland navigation. Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 12, 143–148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.12.01.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solinen, E., Nicholson, G., Peterson, A.: A microscopic evaluation of railway timetable robustness and critical points. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag. 7, 207–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2017.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi, Y., Tomii, N.: Robustness indices for train rescheduling. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tubis, A., Gruszczyk, A.: Measurement of punctuality of services at a public transport company. In: Carpathian Logistics Congress, Jesenik, Czech Republic, pp. 512–517 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tubis, A.: Route risk assessment for road transport companies. In: Contemporary Complex Systems and their Dependability, vol. 761, pp. 492–503. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91446-6_46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walkowiak, T., Mazurkiewicz, J.: Analysis of critical situations in discrete transport systems. In: Proceedings of DepCoS - RELCOMEX 2009, Brunów, Poland, pp. 364–371 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1109/depcos-relcomex.2009.39

  23. Walkowiak, T., Mazurkiewicz, J.: Soft computing approach to discrete transport system management. LNCS. LNAI, vol. 6114, pp. 675–682 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13232-2_83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wyrzykowski, W.: Ruch kolejowy. Wydawnictwa Komunikacji, Warszawa (1954)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franciszek J. Restel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haładyn, S., Restel, F.J., Wolniewicz, Ł. (2020). Method for Railway Timetable Evaluation in Terms of Random Infrastructure Load. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Engineering in Dependability of Computer Systems and Networks. DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 987. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19501-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics