Abstract
The analysis of the modern small satellite on-board systems resilience assessment methods while managing their configuration and reconfiguration under the conditions of predictable emergency flight situations has shown that in case of conditions of unpredictable emergency flight situations these methods are not acceptable. It should be noted that they are not acceptable in case of the design and creation of the on-board system completely differing in composition and structure from known on-board systems. This situation requires the development of conceptually new methodological foundations for assessing the resilience of the small satellite on-board systems, conducting an analysis of such an important feature as the structural resilience of the small satellite on-board systems configuration. The article presents possible ways of assessing the structural resilience of the small satellites on-board system configurations, reflecting the implementation of its own functions by the elements and subsystems of the small satellites on-board systems, as well as their participation in the technological operations of the small satellites control under various scenarios of the implementation of the flight program.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akhmetov, R.N., Makarov, V.P., Sollogub, A.V.: Baipasnost kak atribut zhivuchesti avtomaticheskikh kosmicheskikh apparatov v anomalnykh poletnykh situatsiiakh [Bypass as an attribute of unmanned satellite operability in anomalous flight situations]. Vestnik Samarskogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta, no. 4(44), pp. 9–21 (2015). (In Russian)
Small Satellites: A Revolution in Space Science/Final Report, 83 p. Keck Institute for Space Studies, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, July 2014
Sandau, R., Röser, H.-P., Valenzuela, A.: Small Satellites for Earth Observation: Selected Contributions, 406 p. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art/Mission Design Division Staff, 168 p. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, December 2015
Huges, P.C.: Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics, 585 p. Dover Publications, New York (2004)
Manuilov, Ju.S., Novikov, E.A., Pavlov, A.N., Kudriashov, A.N., Petroshenko, A.V.: Sistemnyi analiz i organizatsiia avtomatizirovannogo upravleniia kosmicheskimi apparatami [System analysis and organization of automated satellite control], 266 p. VKA imeni A.F. Mozhajskogo, SPb (2010). (In Russian)
Pavlov, A.N.: Nechetko-vozmozhnostnyi podkhod k analizu i otsenivaniiu bezopasnosti slozhnykh organizatsionno tekhnicheskikh sistem [Fuzzy – possibility approach to the analysis and assessment of the security of complex organizational and technical systems]. Materiali XI Sankt–Peterburgskoi mejdunarodnoi konferencii RI–2008, pp. 48–49. Sankt-Peterburgskoe obshchestvo informatiki vychislitelnoi tekhniki i sistem upravleniia, Spb (2008). (In Russian)
Aleshin, E.N., Zinovev, S.V., Kopkin, E.V., Osipenko, S.A., Pavlov, A.N., Sokolov, B.V.: Sistemnyi analiz organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh sistem kosmicheskogo naznacheniia [System analysis of organizational and technical systems for space applications], 357 p. VKA imeni A.F. Mozhajskogo, Spb (2018). (In Russian)
Pavlov, A.N., Osipenko, S.A.: Metodika otsenivaniia tekhnicheskogo sostoianiia sredstv nazemnogo avtomatizirovannogo kompleksa upravleniia kosmicheskimi apparatami [Methods of assessing the technical condition of ground-based automated control systems for satellites]. In: Trudy Voenno-kosmicheskoj akademii im. A.F. Mozhajskogo, vol. 27, pp. 159–169 (2008). (In Russian)
Polenin, V.I., Riabinin, I.A., Svirin, S.K., Gladkova, I.A.: Primenenie obshchego logiko veroiatnostnogo metoda dlia analiza tekhnicheskikh voennykh organizatsionno funktsionalnykh sistem i vooruzhennogo protivoborstva [The use of a common logical – probabilistic method for the analysis of technical, military organizational and functional systems and armed confrontation], 416 p. The Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Spb (2011). (In Russian)
Opytno-tekhnologicheskiy malyy kosmicheskiy apparat «AIST-2D» [Experimental technological small satellite “AIST-2D”], 324 p. Samarskiy nauchnyy tsentr Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, Samara (2017). (In Russian)
Acknowledgements
The research described in this paper is partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 16-29-09482-ofi-i, 17-08-00797, 17-06-00108, 17-01-00139, 17-20-01214, 17-29-07073-ofi-i, 18-07-01272, 18-08-01505, 19-08-00989) state order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation № 2.3135.2017/4.6, state research 0073–2019–0004, International project ERASMUS+, Capacity building in higher education, № 73751-EPP-1-2016-1-DE-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP, Innovative teaching and learning strategies in open modelling and simulation environment for student-centered engineering education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pavlov, A.N., Pavlov, D.A., Kopkin, E.V., Kulakov, A.Y. (2019). Assessing the Small Satellites Resilience in Conditions of Anomalous Flight Situation. In: Silhavy, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Methods in Intelligent Algorithms. CSOC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 985. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19810-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19810-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19809-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19810-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)