Skip to main content

Alternatives for Scheduling Departures for Efficient Surface Metering in ATD-2: Exploration in a Human-in-the-Loop Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

A Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) simulation was conducted to explore the impacts of various surface metering goals on operations and Ramp Controllers at Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT). Three conditions were compared: (1) Baseline, with no surface metering, (2) instructions to meet advisory times at the gate only, and (3) instructions to meet advisory times at the gate as well as the times at the scheduled taxiway spot, where aircraft are delivered to Air Traffic Control (ATC). Results showed increased compliance for taxiway spot times when compliance was first met for gate advisories. Instructing Ramp Controllers to meet advisory times at the gate improves spot time compliance and therefore surface scheduling predictability at CLT. Results also demonstrated there was increased compliance overall with gate and spot times in the second condition. This was likely due to higher Ramp Controller workload in the third condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 3D SART consists of a score obtained by adding an item rating “your Understanding of the traffic situation” to an item rating “the Supply of your attentional resources” and subtracting an item rating “Demand on your attention” (i.e., SA = U + (S − D)).

References

  1. Jung, Y., et al.: Airspace Technology Demonstration 2 (ATD-2) Phase 1 Concept of Use (ConUse), NASA/TM-2018-219770, February 2018

    Google Scholar 

  2. FAA Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS): Airport Rankings for 2018 by Operations (2018). https://aspm.faa.gov/opsnet/sys/opsnet-server-x.asp

  3. FAA Air Traffic Organization Surface Operations Directorate: U.S. Airport Surface Collaborative Decision Making Concept of Operations (ConOps) in the Near-Term: Application of the Surface Concept at United States Airports, June 2012. https://faaco.faa.gov/index.cfm/attachment/download/33926

  4. Aviation Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Airspace Technology Demonstration 2 (ATD-2) Overview. https://www.aviationsystems.arc.nasa.gov/research/atd2index.shtml. Accessed 7 May 2019

  5. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of a NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.S., Meshkati, N., Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Proceedings of the AGARD AMP Symposium on Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations, CP478. Seuilly-sur Seine: NATO AGARD (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parke, B., Jobe, K., Chevalley, E., Verma, S., Dulchinos, V., Stevens, L.: Impact of data exchange provided by ATD-2 Tools at Charlotte-Douglas international airport. In: 9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, FL, 21–25 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coupe, W.J., Lee, H., Jung, Y., Chen, L., Robeson, I.: Scheduling improvements following the Phase 1 field evaluation of the ATD-2 integrated arrival, departure, and surface concept. In: 13th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Manuscript in progress (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the many Ramp Controllers, ATC Controllers, and pseudo-pilots who participated in this simulation, along with the ATD-2 Team and the Future Flight Central Simulation Team that made the simulation possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonny K. Parke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parke, B.K. et al. (2020). Alternatives for Scheduling Departures for Efficient Surface Metering in ATD-2: Exploration in a Human-in-the-Loop Simulation. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 956. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20036-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20037-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics