Skip to main content

Effectiveness in Prosthetic Adaptation and Users’ Satisfaction: Comparison Between Different Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

The effectiveness of a hearing aid (HA) is commonly assessed by a questionnaire that provide information on the benefits/disadvantages of the use of the HA in real life situations. This work wants to analyze if acoustic benefit and satisfaction levels depend by an HA equipped with different technologies (Basic technology HA, Medium technology HA, Premium technology HA trough the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) questionnaire administered to 60 patients and the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) questionnaire administered to 14 patients. The results show that regardless of technology, persistent problems remain such as perception in noisy environments. A further effort is required by the technicians in the evaluation of the patient as a whole, from the identification of the HA that ergonomically better suits the needs of each patient until the adaptation in complex environments, for the minimization of the perception of disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Orlando, M.P., Lo Castro, F., Iarossi, S., Mariconte, R., Longo, L., Giliberti, C.: Ergonomics and acoustics in music education. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 827, 23–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lopez-Poveda, E.A., Johannesen, P.T., Pérez-González, P., Blanco, J.L., Kalluri, S., Edwards, B.: Predictors of hearing-aid outcomes. Trends Hear. 21, 23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO: Deafness and hearing loss, 15 March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly, T.B., Tolson, D., Day, T., McColgan, G., Kroll, T., Maclaren, W.: Older people’s views on what they need to successfully adjust to life with a hearing aid. Health Soc. Care Community 21(3), 293–302 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jennings, M.B., Shaw, L.: Impact of hearing loss in the workplace: raising questions about partnerships with professionals. Work 30(3), 289–295 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trottier, M., Leroux, T., Deadman, J.E.: Le bruit. Manuel d’hygiène du travail: Du diagnostic à la maîtrise des facteurs de risque. Association québécoise pour l’hygiène, la santé et la sécurité du travail (Ed). Modulo-Griffon: Mont-Royal, Québec, pp. 159–183 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Picard, M., Poulin, M.: Noise as an explanatory factor in work-related fatality reports: a descriptive study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, 21–25 July 2008, Mashantucket, CT, USA, pp. 188–196 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nkyekyer, J., Meyer, D., Blamey, P.J., Pipingas, A., Bhar, S.: Investigating the impact of hearing aid use and auditory training on cognition, depressive symptoms, and social interaction in adults with hearing loss: protocol for a crossover trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 7(3), e85 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vestergaard Knudsen, L., Öberg, M., Nielsen, C., Naylor, G., Kramer, S.E.: Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif. 14(3), 127–154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. IEC 60118-0 - Electroacoustics-Hearing Aids - Part 0: Measurement of the Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids. IEC, 1 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ralli, M., Greco, A., Cialente, F., Di Stadio, A., De Virgilio, A., Longo, L., Ciofalo, A., Turchetta, R., Cianfrone, G., De Vincentiis, M.: Somatic tinnitus. Int. Tinnitus J. 21(2), 112–121 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C., Gray, G.A.: Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing aid seekers. Ear Hear. 26(1), 12–26 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox, R.M., Stephens, D., Kramer, S.E.: Translations of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). Int. J. Audiol. 41, 3–26 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ventry, I.M., Weinstein, B.E.: Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA Am. Speech-Lang.-Hear. Assoc. 25, 37–42 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenstein, M.J., Bess, F.H., Logan, S.A.: Validation of screening tools for identifying hearing-impaired elderly in primary care. JAMA 259(19), 2875–2878 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Longo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Orlando, M.P., Giliberti, C., Lo Castro, F., Mariconte, R., Longo, L. (2020). Effectiveness in Prosthetic Adaptation and Users’ Satisfaction: Comparison Between Different Technologies. In: Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 970. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20144-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20145-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics