Skip to main content

Anthropometric Analyses of Head and Face Shape to Design Protective Headgear for U.S. Army Personnel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 975))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to elicit an understanding of the anthropometric variation for the face and head. All face and head dimensions in ANSUR II were compared between male and female as well as among different population subgroups. The averages of all head and face dimensions for male personnel were larger than those for female personnel by 5 to 13 mm for the head dimensions, with Head Circumference showing the maximum difference, and by 2 to 28 mm for the face dimensions, with Bitragion Submandibular Arc showing the maximum difference. Furthermore, results also revealed statistically significant differences for the head and face dimensions among different population subgroups. A multivariate analysis (PCA) was conducted on the male and female databases separately. Three PCs were extracted from the male database that explained 70% of total variance. Three PCs were also extracted from the female database that explained 69% total variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bradtmiller, B., Friess, M.: A head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users. Final report. Anthrotech, Yellow Springs, OH 45387 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, W., Goto, L., Molenbroek, J.F.M., Goossens, R.H.M.: Analysis methods of the variation of facial size and shape based on 3D face scan images. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 Annual Meeting (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon, C.C., Blackwell, C.L., Bradtmiller, B., Parham, J.L., Barrientos, P., Paquette, S.P., Corner, B.D., Carson, J.M., Venezia, J.C., Rockwell, B.M., Mucher, M., Kristensen, S.: 2010–2012 anthropometric survey of U.S. army personnel: methods and summary statistics. Technical report (Natick/TR-15/007). U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760-2646 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon, C.C., Bradtmiller, B., Clauser, C.E., Churchill, T., McConville, J.T., Tebbetts, I., Walker, R.A.: 1987–1988 anthropometric survey of U.S. army personnel: methods and summary statistics. Technical report (RT-89-044) (ADA225 094). U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760-2646 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 15535: General Requirements for Establishing Anthropometric Databases. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hotzman, J., Gordon, C.C., Bradtmiller, B., Corner, B.D., Mucher, M., Kristensen, S., Paquette, S.P., Blackwell, C.L.: Measurer’s handbook: US army and marine corps anthropometric surveys, 2010–2011. Technical report (Natick/TR-11/017). U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760-2646 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zehner, G.F., Meindl, R.M., Hudson, J.S.: A multivariate anthropometric method for crew station design: abridged crew systems directorate, human engineering division. Technical report AL-TR-1992-0164. Armstrong Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garlie, T., Choi, H.J.: Anthropometric difference among population group and the impact on military clothing and equipment design. In: 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, Florida (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC) Soldier Center research program 19-117. The authors would like to thank those Warfighters who volunteered as test participants of ANSUR II for their time and effort, as well as for the sacrifices they make every day for our country.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeg Joo Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Choi, H.J., Garlie, T.N., Parham, J.L. (2020). Anthropometric Analyses of Head and Face Shape to Design Protective Headgear for U.S. Army Personnel. In: Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E., Alexander, T. (eds) Advances in Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 975. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20216-3_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20216-3_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20215-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20216-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics