Skip to main content

Human Interaction with the Output of Information Extraction Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 965))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2494 Accesses

Abstract

Information Extraction (IE) research has made remarkable progress in Natural Language Processing using intrinsic measures, but little attention has been paid to human analysts as downstream processors. In one experiment, when participants were presented text with or without markup from an IE pipeline, they showed better text comprehension without markup. In a second experiment, the markup was hand-generated to be as relevant and accurate as possible to find conditions under which markup improves performance. This experiment showed no significant difference between performance with and without markup, but a significant majority of participants preferred working with markup to without. Further, preference for markup showed a fairly strong correlation with participants’ ratings of their own trust in automation. These results emphasize the importance of testing IE systems with actual users and the importance of trust in automation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [2] though for outstanding issues in NER, such as “different definitions of NE, different types of text, different languages, and noisy data such as OCR and S2T.”

  2. 2.

    See also [7] for work with ELICIT and additional scenarios.

References

  1. Cunningham, H.: Information extraction, automatic. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn., pp. 665–677. Elsevier, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Marrero, M., Urbano, J., Sánchez-Cuadrado, S., Morato, J., Gómez-Berbís, J.M.: Named entity recognition: fallacies, challenges and opportunities. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 35, 482–489 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaroukian, E.: Information extraction for optimized human understanding and decision making. In: Proceedings of ICCRTS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruddy, M.: ELICIT – the experimental laboratory for the investigation of collaboration, information sharing, and trust. In: Proceedings of the 12th ICCRTS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Q., Ji, H.: Incremental joint extraction of entity mentions and relations. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 402–412. ACL, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Q., Ji, H., Huang, L.: Joint event extraction via structured prediction with global features. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 73–82. ACL, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krausman, A.: Understanding audio communication delay in distributed team interaction: impact on trust, shared understanding, and workload. In: Proceedings of the IEEE CogSIMA Conference, pp. 1–3. IEEExplore (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. NASA: NASA Task Load Index (TLX), v. 1.0 Manual (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, T.R.: Guidelines for designing and evaluating the display of information on the Web. Tech. Commu. 47(3), 383–396 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jian, J.Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4(1), 53–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Stephen Tratz, Claire Bonial, Jeffrey Micher, Clare Voss, Jon Bakdash, Lucia Donatelli, and Jeff Hoye for their assistance in designing, deploying, and interpreting this work. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Student Research Participation Program at the Army Research Laboratory administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between U.S. Department of Energy and ARL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Zaroukian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zaroukian, E., Caylor, J., Vanni, M., Kase, S. (2020). Human Interaction with the Output of Information Extraction Systems. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 965. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20453-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20454-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics