Abstract
This study examined drivers’ responses to simulated autonomous technology failures in semi-autonomous vehicles. A population of 40 individuals was tested, considering the following independent variables: age of the driver, speed at disengagement, and time at which the disengagement occurred. Participants received auditory and visual warning at the time of disengagement and were asked to regain control of the vehicle while maneuvering within a S-curve turn. Participants’ perception associated to the estimation of success of the control takeover, estimation of test duration, and estimation of the speed of travel showed poor accuracy. Speed recollection accuracy was lower for older participants, while younger participants showed overconfidence in the assessment of the quality of their control takeover. The employed human-machine interface highlighted concerns on the use of central console displays. Trust in the technology and nervousness to the possibility of a disengagement showed higher levels of anxiety for high speeds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazilinskyy, P., De Winter, J.C.F.: Analyzing crowdsourced ratings of speech-based take-over requests for automated driving. Appl. Ergon. 64, 56–64 (2017)
California Department of Motor Vehicles (CA DMV).: Article 3.7 – Autonomous Vehicles. Title 13, Division 1, par. 227.32, Autonomous Vehicles Order to Adopt (2018)
Favaro, F.M., Seewald, P., Scholtes, M., Eurich, S.: Quality of control takeover following disengagements in semi-autonomous vehicles. Submitted to J. of Transp. Res., November (2018)
Mok, B.K.J., Johns, M., Lee, K.J., Ive, H.P., Miller, D., Ju, W.: Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1167–1172. IEEE (2015)
Society of Automotive Engineers – SAE.: On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards committee. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (2014)
US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).: Licensed Drivers in the US Demographics for 2016 (2016)
Zhu, W., Zeng, N., Wang, N.: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS implementations. NESUG proceedings: health care and life sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, 19, 67 (2010)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the help from Mr. Sky Eurich, Mrs. Nazanin Nader, and Mrs. Shivangi Agarwal for the data collection process. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The report is funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program (69A3551747127) managed by the Mineta Transportation Institute of San Jose. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rizvi, S., Favaro, F., Mahmood, S. (2020). Participant Perception and HMI Preferences During Simulated AV Disengagements. In: Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20467-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20467-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20466-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20467-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)