Skip to main content

Promoting Soldier Cognitive Readiness for Battle Tank Operations Through Bio-signal Measurements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

This paper will present the progress in developing a concept and a demonstrator system for the assessment of fatigue, acute stress and combat/cognitive readiness in military domain. A battle-tank crew’s acute stress is measured with electrocardiography recordings of heart rate/heart rate variability. Cognitive performance is measured with a battery of cognitive tests, and task performance is estimated by soldiers’ self-ratings, trainers’ evaluations and objective measures from simulator data. The project consists of several test sessions in which cognitive and physiological indices of stress are measured while military conscripts perform battle-tank exercises both in simulator and field settings. The effect of task difficulty, sleep deprivation and operator role on performance are investigated. Different versions of the demonstrator system are also evaluated. The project results will be primarily used for the development of a bio-signal monitoring system, evaluation of transfer of simulator training to real-life exercises and improvement of military aptitude testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scriven, J.G.: Main battle tank crew in-tank activities and workload. Doctoral thesis (1993). https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32084

  2. Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orasanu, J.M., Backer, P.: Stress and military performance. In: Driskell, J.E., Salas, E. (eds.) Stress and Human Performance, pp. 89–125. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salas, E., Driskell, J.E., Huges, S.: Introduction: the study of stress and human performance. In: Driskell, J.E., Salas, E. (eds.) Stress and Human Performance, pp. 1–45. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedl, K.E.: Military applications of soldier physiological monitoring. J. Sci. Med. Sport 21, 1147–1153 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kutilek, P., Vlf, P., Viteckova, S., Smrcka, P., Krivanek, V., Lhotska, L., Hana, K., Doskocil, R., Navratil, L., Hon, Z., Stefek, A.: Wearable systems for monitoring the health condition of soldiers. Review and application. In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference of Military Technologies (ICMT), pp. 748–752, May 31–June 2, 2017. IEEE, Brno, Czech Republic (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Virkkala, J., Hasan, J., Värri, A., Himanen, S.L., Müller, K.: Automatic sleep stage classification using two-channel electro-oculography. J. Neurosci. Methods 166, 109–115 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Henelius, A., Hirvonen, K., Holm, A., Korpela, J., Muller, K.: Mental workload classification using heart rate metrics. In: 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1836–1839. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oie, K.S., Gordon, K., McDowell, K.: The multi-aspect measurement approach: rationale, technologies, tools, and challenges for systems design. In: Savage-Knepshield, P., Martin, J., Lockett III, J., Allender, L. (eds.) Designing Soldier Systems. Current Issues in Human Factors. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., Weimer, D.L.: Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Räikkönen, M., Kunttu, S., Poussa, L., Blobner, C.: Benefits, risks and costs of security measures. A portfolio-oriented decision-support approach for political decision-making. In: Lauster, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th Future Security Research Conference, pp. 442–444. Fraunhofer Verlag, Berlin, Stuttgart, 17–19 September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. IEC 60300-3-3 Ed.3.0: Dependability management – Part 3-3. Application guide – Life Cycle Costing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. RTO: Methods and Models for Life Cycle Costing. RTO Technical Report. Final Report of Task Group SAS-054. Research and Technology Organisation North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. TR-SAS-054 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Technology Program of the Finnish Defence Forces. We thank the Karelia Brigade, the military trainees and conscripts of the Brigade and members of the reference group for making this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jari Laarni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laarni, J. et al. (2020). Promoting Soldier Cognitive Readiness for Battle Tank Operations Through Bio-signal Measurements. In: Ayaz, H. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 953. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics