Skip to main content

Using the Lane Change Test to Investigate In-Vehicle Display Placements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors of Transportation (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 964))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2444 Accesses

Abstract

Driving performance was measured using the lane change test (LCT). Participants followed lane change instructions presented in three locations: road signs, a head-up display (HUD), and a head-down display (HDD). To measure the participants’ ability to detect ecologically-valid stimuli while viewing the displays, a peripheral detection task (PDT) with inward-moving stimuli from either side of the road was applied on half of tracks. Interacting with the HDD resulted in the poorest driving performance, and similar driving performance was found with the road signs and the HUD. Further analyses revealed that the participants’ age had an effect on their performance with the display locations. The younger age group (20–24 years) drove the best with the HUD; while the older age group (26–31 years) drove the best with the road signs. PDT performance differences were not significant. Results indicate that HUDs may be a good option for displaying navigational information to drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States (2018). http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/

  2. Currin, A.: U drive. U text. U pay. In: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norman, D.A., Bobrow, D.G.: On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 44–64 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez-Duque, D., Johnson, M.L.: Cause and effect theories of attention: the role of conceptual metaphors. In: Review of General Psychology, pp. 153–165 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haj-Assaad, S.: 8 car features that will soon be obsolete. In: AutoGuide.com News. https://www.autoguide.com/autonews/2016/05/8-car-featuresthat-will-soon-be-obsolete.html

  6. Estrada, M.: Mpow’s $30 HUD has more features than the head-up display in a $100,000 Mercedes. https://bgr.com/2017/06/06/smartphone-hudcarprojector-amazon-iphone-android/

  7. Inuzuka, Y., Osumi, Y., Shinkai, H.: Visibility of head up display (HUD) for automobiles. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1574–1578 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y., Wen, M.: Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61, 679–697 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biberman, L.M., Alluisi, E.A.: Pilot errors involving head-up displays, helmet-mounted displays, and night vision goggles. Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M., Triggs, T., Brown, J.: Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. In: Accident Analysis & Prevention, pp. 185–191 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Organization for Standardization: Road vehicles – Ergonomic aspects of transportation information and control systems – Simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand (ISO/DIS Standard No. 26022), Geneva, Switzerland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harbluk, J.L., Burns, P.C., Lochner, M., Trbovich, P.L.: Using the lane change test (LCT) to assess distraction: tests of visual-manual and speech-based operation of navigation system interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hada, H.: Drivers’ visual attention to in-vehicle displays: effects of display location and road type. Technical report, The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tretton, P., Garlin, A., Nilsson, R., Larsson, T.: An on-road study of head-up display: preferred location and acceptance levels. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1914–1918 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson, S., Burns, P.C.: Measuring driver visual distraction with a peripheral detection task. Volvo Technological Development Corporation, Gothenburg, Sweden (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burnett, G.E.: A road-based evaluation of a head-up display for presenting navigation information. In: Proceedings of HCI International Conference, pp. 180–184 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moran, S.N.: Performance and attentional abilities of automobile drivers with head-up and head-down displays (Master’s thesis). California State University, Long Beach (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina N. Moran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moran, S.N., Strybel, T.Z., Hancock, G.M., Vu, KP.L. (2020). Using the Lane Change Test to Investigate In-Vehicle Display Placements. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors of Transportation. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 964. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20502-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20503-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics