Abstract
We identify time periods of disruption in the voting patterns of the Ukrainian parliament for the last three convocations. We compare two methods: ideal point estimation (PolSci) and faction detection (CS). Both methods identify the revolution in Ukraine in 2014. The faction detection method also detects structural changes prior to the revolution (election of the president whose tenure was ended early by the revolution), while the ideal points method performs stronger after 2014, identifying a disruption around voting on constitutional changes to implement Minsk II agreements between separatists and Ukraine. The ideal point method is better at detecting position changes of the members of parliament, while the faction method is better at detecting changes in relationships between different MPs. The results suggest that after 2014, the Ukrainian parliament has become more consolidated, but the distribution of its political positions continues to evolve in response to changes in geo-political conditions.
This material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) under award number N00014-17-1-2675. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research. Additionally, Thomas Magelinski was supported by an ARCS foundation scholarship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Verkhovna rada of ukraine, February 2018 . http://rada.gov.ua/en
Aynaud, T., Fleury, E., Guillaume, J.L., Wang, Q.: Communities in evolving networks: definitions, detection, and analysis techniques. In: Mukherjee, A., Choudhury, M., Peruani, F., Ganguly, N., Mitra, B. (eds.) Dynamics On and Of Complex Networks, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, vol. 2, pp. 159–200. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6729-8_9
Bailey, M.A.: Comparable preference estimates across time and institutions for the court, congress, and presidency. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51(3), 433–448 (2007)
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)
Caughey, D., Warshaw, C.: Dynamic estimation of latent opinion using a hierarchical group-level irt model. Polit. Anal. 23(2), 197–211 (2015)
Clinton, J., Jackman, S., Rivers, D.: The statistical analysis of roll call data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98(2), 355–370 (2004)
Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(5), 603–619 (2002)
Friedkin, N.E.: A structural Theory of Social Influence, vol. 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Friedkin, N.E., Johnsen, E.: Social influence networks and opinion chance. Adv. Group Process. 16, 1–29 (1999)
Gower, J.C.: A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4), 857–871 (1971)
Jackman, S.: Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Polit. Anal. 9(3), 227–241 (2001)
MacRae Jr., D.: Dimensions of Congressional Voting: A Statistical Study of the House of Representatives in the Eighty-First Congress. University of California Press, California (1958)
Magelinski, T., Cruickshank, I., Carley, K.M.: Comparison of faction detection methods in application to ukrainian parliamentary data (2018)
Martin, A.D., Quinn, K.M.: Dynamic ideal point estimation via markov chain monte carlo for the us supreme court, 1953–1999. Polit. Anal. 10(2), 134–153 (2002)
Mucha, P.J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M.A., Onnela, J.P.: Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science 328(5980), 876–878 (2010)
Newman, M.E.: Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69(6), 066133 (2004)
Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 29(2), 357–384 (1985)
Rossetti, G., Cazabet, R.: Community discovery in dynamic networks: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(2), 35 (2018)
Sun, J., Faloutsos, C., Faloutsos, C., Papadimitriou, S., Yu, P.S.: Graphscope: parameter-free mining of large time-evolving graphs. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 687–696. ACM (2007)
Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C.: Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. J. Polit. 75(2), 330–342 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Magelinski, T., Hou, J., Mylovanov, T., Carley, K.M. (2019). Detecting Disruption: Identifying Structural Changes in the Verkhovna Rada. In: Thomson, R., Bisgin, H., Dancy, C., Hyder, A. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21740-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21741-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)