Skip to main content

Detecting Disruption: Identifying Structural Changes in the Verkhovna Rada

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (SBP-BRiMS 2019)

Abstract

We identify time periods of disruption in the voting patterns of the Ukrainian parliament for the last three convocations. We compare two methods: ideal point estimation (PolSci) and faction detection (CS). Both methods identify the revolution in Ukraine in 2014. The faction detection method also detects structural changes prior to the revolution (election of the president whose tenure was ended early by the revolution), while the ideal points method performs stronger after 2014, identifying a disruption around voting on constitutional changes to implement Minsk II agreements between separatists and Ukraine. The ideal point method is better at detecting position changes of the members of parliament, while the faction method is better at detecting changes in relationships between different MPs. The results suggest that after 2014, the Ukrainian parliament has become more consolidated, but the distribution of its political positions continues to evolve in response to changes in geo-political conditions.

This material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) under award number N00014-17-1-2675. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research. Additionally, Thomas Magelinski was supported by an ARCS foundation scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verkhovna rada of ukraine, February 2018 . http://rada.gov.ua/en

  2. Aynaud, T., Fleury, E., Guillaume, J.L., Wang, Q.: Communities in evolving networks: definitions, detection, and analysis techniques. In: Mukherjee, A., Choudhury, M., Peruani, F., Ganguly, N., Mitra, B. (eds.) Dynamics On and Of Complex Networks, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, vol. 2, pp. 159–200. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6729-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, M.A.: Comparable preference estimates across time and institutions for the court, congress, and presidency. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51(3), 433–448 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caughey, D., Warshaw, C.: Dynamic estimation of latent opinion using a hierarchical group-level irt model. Polit. Anal. 23(2), 197–211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinton, J., Jackman, S., Rivers, D.: The statistical analysis of roll call data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98(2), 355–370 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(5), 603–619 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedkin, N.E.: A structural Theory of Social Influence, vol. 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedkin, N.E., Johnsen, E.: Social influence networks and opinion chance. Adv. Group Process. 16, 1–29 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gower, J.C.: A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4), 857–871 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackman, S.: Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Polit. Anal. 9(3), 227–241 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacRae Jr., D.: Dimensions of Congressional Voting: A Statistical Study of the House of Representatives in the Eighty-First Congress. University of California Press, California (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Magelinski, T., Cruickshank, I., Carley, K.M.: Comparison of faction detection methods in application to ukrainian parliamentary data (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, A.D., Quinn, K.M.: Dynamic ideal point estimation via markov chain monte carlo for the us supreme court, 1953–1999. Polit. Anal. 10(2), 134–153 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mucha, P.J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M.A., Onnela, J.P.: Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science 328(5980), 876–878 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.E.: Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69(6), 066133 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 29(2), 357–384 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossetti, G., Cazabet, R.: Community discovery in dynamic networks: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(2), 35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, J., Faloutsos, C., Faloutsos, C., Papadimitriou, S., Yu, P.S.: Graphscope: parameter-free mining of large time-evolving graphs. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 687–696. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C.: Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. J. Polit. 75(2), 330–342 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Magelinski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Magelinski, T., Hou, J., Mylovanov, T., Carley, K.M. (2019). Detecting Disruption: Identifying Structural Changes in the Verkhovna Rada. In: Thomson, R., Bisgin, H., Dancy, C., Hyder, A. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21740-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21741-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics