Skip to main content

Fuzzy Set Similarity Between Fuzzy Words

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fuzzy Techniques: Theory and Applications (IFSA/NAFIPS 2019 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1000))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 708 Accesses

Abstract

Fuzzy set similarity measures determine the similarity between two fuzzy sets. Semantic similarity measures determine the similarity between concepts within an ontology. Research in determining sentence similarity has used semantic similarity between fuzzy words that have been structured in an ontology based on data provided by human experts to create fuzzy sets for these fuzzy words. The research uses four different kinds of fuzzy set similarity measures, three that are standard ones for type-1 fuzzy sets and another one based on the distance between defuzzified and normalized COGs for type-2 fuzzy sets and examines both the Pearson and Spearman correlations among these different fuzzy set similarity measures on fuzzy words from four of the six categories established in past sentence similarity research. The results show that all standard fuzzy set measures are highly correlated though some categories of fuzzy words result in higher correlations than others. The standard fuzzy set similarity measures have lower correlation with the one developed for similarity between type-2 fuzzy sets using their defuzzified and normalized COGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh, L. (ed.): Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Landauer, T., Foltz, P., Laham, D.: An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(3), 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Comput. Linguist. 32, 13–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Y., Mclean, D., Bandar, Z., O’Shea, J., Crockett, K.: Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18(8), 1138–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Y., Bandar, Z., McLean, D.: An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(4), 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandran, D., Crockett, K.A., McLean, D., Bandar, Z.: FAST: a fuzzy semantic sentence similarity measure. In: International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adel, N., Crockett, K.A., Crispin, A., Chandran, D., Carvalho, J.P.: FUSE (Fuzzy Similarity Measure) - a measure for determining fuzzy short text similarity using Interval Type-2 fuzzy sets. In: International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cross, V., Mokrenko, V., Krockett, K., Adel, N.: Ontological and fuzzy set similarity between perception-based words. Submitted to Fuzz-IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cross, V.: An analysis of fuzzy set aggregators and compatibility measures, 264 p. Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, March 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaccard, P.: The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 11, 37–50 (1912)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cross, V., Sudkamp, T.: Geometric compatibility modification. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 84(3), 283–299 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hao, M., Mendel, J.M.: Encoding words into normal interval type-2 fuzzy sets: HM approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 24(4), 865–879 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This continued research is based on the data provided for the previous research in [9] by researchers Keeley Crockett and Naeemeh Adel. We want to thank them for their assistance in making this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie Cross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cross, V., Mokrenko, V. (2019). Fuzzy Set Similarity Between Fuzzy Words. In: Kearfott, R., Batyrshin, I., Reformat, M., Ceberio, M., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Fuzzy Techniques: Theory and Applications. IFSA/NAFIPS 2019 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1000. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21920-8_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics