Skip to main content

Learning by Arguing in Argument-Based Machine Learning Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11528))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose an approach for the development of argument-based intelligent tutoring systems in which a domain that can be successfully addressed by supervised machine learning is taught in an interactive learning environment. The system is able to automatically select relevant examples and counter-examples to be explained by the students. The students learn by explaining specific examples, and the system provides automated feedback on students’ arguments, including generating hints. The role of an argument-based intelligent tutoring system is then to train the students to find the most relevant arguments. The students learn about the high-level domain concepts and then use them to argue about automatically selected examples. We demonstrate our approach in an online application that allows students to learn through arguments with the goal of improving their understanding of financial statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M.: Arguing to learn. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, chap. 22, pp. 439–460. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D.D.: Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A., Cocking, R.: How People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School. National Research Council, Washington (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, M.T., VanLehn, K.A.: The content of physics self-explanations. J. Learn. Sci. 1(1), 69–105 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, P., Boswell, R.: Rule induction with CN2: some recent improvements. In: Kodratoff, Y. (ed.) EWSL 1991. LNCS, vol. 482, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017011

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganguin, B., Bilardello, J.: Standard and Poor’s Fundamentals of Corporate Credit Analysis. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Groznik, V., et al.: Elicitation of neurological knowledge with argument-based machine learning. Artif. Intell. Med. 57(2), 133–144 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guid, M., et al.: ABML knowledge refinement loop: a case study. In: Chen, L., Felfernig, A., Liu, J., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7661, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34624-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Guid, M., Možina, M., Krivec, J., Sadikov, A., Bratko, I.: Learning positional features for annotating chess games: a case study. In: van den Herik, H.J., Xu, X., Ma, Z., Winands, M.H.M. (eds.) CG 2008. LNCS, vol. 5131, pp. 192–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87608-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Holt, R.: Financial Accounting: A Management Perspective. Ivy Learning Systems (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Možina, M., Guid, M., Krivec, J., Sadikov, A., Bratko, I.: Fighting knowledge acquisition bottleneck with argument based machine learning. In: The 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 234–238. Patras, Greece (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based machine learning. Artif. Intell. 171(10/15), 922–937 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Možina, M., Lazar, T., Bratko, I.: Identifying typical approaches and errors in prolog programming with argument-based machine learning. Expert Syst. Appl. 112, 110–124 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolf, B.P.: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing E-learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zapušek, M., Možina, M., Bratko, I., Rugelj, J., Guid, M.: Designing an interactive teaching tool with ABML knowledge refinement loop. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 575–582. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej Guid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guid, M., Možina, M., Pavlič, M., Turšič, K. (2019). Learning by Arguing in Argument-Based Machine Learning Framework. In: Coy, A., Hayashi, Y., Chang, M. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11528. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22243-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22244-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics