Abstract
We present results from two studies comparing the performance of four different navigation techniques (flight, teleportation, world-in-miniature, and 3D cone-drag) and their combinations in large virtual reality map environments. While prior work has individually examined each of these techniques in other settings, our study presents the first direct comparison between them in large open environments, as well as one of the first comparisons in the context of current-generation virtual reality hardware. Our first study compared common techniques (flight, teleportation, and world-in-miniature) for search and navigation tasks. A follow-up study compared these techniques against 3D cone drag, a direct-manipulation navigation technique used in contemporary tools like Google Earth VR. Our results show the strength of flight as a stand-alone navigation technique, but also highlight five specific ways in which viewers can combine teleportation, world-in-miniature, and 3D cone drag with flight, drawing on the relative strengths of each technique to compensate for the weaknesses of others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. (2017)
Argelaguet, F., Maignant, M.: GiAnt: stereoscopic-compliant multi-scale navigation in VEs. In: ACM VRST, pp. 269–277 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993391
Bowman, D.A., Johnson, D.B., Hodges, L.F.: Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10, 75–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601750182333
Bowman, D.A., Koller, D., Hodges, L.F.: Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In: IEEEVR, pp. 45–52 (1997)
Cumming, G.: The new statistics: why and how. Psychol. Sci. 25(1), 7–29 (2014)
Jankowski, J., Hachet, M.: Advances in interaction with 3D environments. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 34, pp. 152–190. Wiley Online Library (2015)
Wang, J., Lindeman, R.W.: Comparing isometric and elastic surfboard interfaces for leaning-based travel in 3D virtual environments. In: IEEE 3DUI, pp. 31–38. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2012.6184181
Käser, D.P., et al.: The making of Google Earth VR. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Talks, pp. 63:1–63:2. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3084363.3085094
Kopper, R., Ni, T., Bowman, D.A., Pinho, M.: Design and evaluation of navigation techniques for multiscale virtual environments. IEEEVR 2006, 175–182 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.47
Krekhov, A., Cmentowski, S., Emmerich, K., Masuch, M., Krüger, J.: GulliVR. In: CHI PLAY, pp. 243–256. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242704
Liu, J., Parekh, H., Al-Zayer, M., Folmer, E.: Increasing walking in VR using redirected teleportation. In: ACM UIST, pp. 521–529 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242601
McCrae, J., Mordatch, I., Glueck, M., Khan, A.: Multiscale 3D navigation. In: I3D, pp. 7–14. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1507149.1507151
Montello, D.R.: Spatial cognition and architectural space: research perspectives. Architect. Des., 74–79 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1811
Peck, T.C., Fuchs, H., Whitton, M.C.: The design and evaluation of a large-scale real-walking locomotion interface. IEEE TVCG 18(7), 1053–1067 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.289
Slater, M., Usoh, M., Steed, A.: Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM TOCHI 2, 201–219 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/210079.210084
Stoakley, R., Conway, M.J., Pausch, R.: Virtual reality on a WIM: interactive worlds in miniature. In: ACM SIGCHI, pp. 265–272 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223938
Trindade, D.R., Raposo, A.B.: Improving 3D navigation in multiscale environments using Cubemap-based techniques. In: ACM SAC, pp. 1215–1221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1982185.1982454
Ware, C., Osborne, S.: Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 175–183 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/91394.91442
Yan, Z., Lindeman, R.W., Dey, A.: Let your fingers do the walking: a unified approach for efficient short-, medium-, and long-distance travel in VR. In: IEEE 3DUI, pp. 27–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2016.7460027
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2016-04564] as well as our colleagues who helped test and give feedback on the techniques and paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Danyluk, K., Willett, W. (2019). Evaluating the Performance of Virtual Reality Navigation Techniques for Large Environments. In: Gavrilova, M., Chang, J., Thalmann, N., Hitzer, E., Ishikawa, H. (eds) Advances in Computer Graphics. CGI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11542. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22514-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22514-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22513-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22514-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)