Skip to main content

Competitive Analysis of “Buy Online and Pick Up in Store” Channel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Ecosystem of e-Business: Technologies, Stakeholders, and Connections (WEB 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 357))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 883 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we model the competition between two firms that each firm can choose a “buy online and pick up in store” (BOPS) channel strategy or an offline channel strategy. We find out when it is optimal for a retailer to offer a BOPS channel by comparing the equilibrium outcomes. Whether to adopt the BOPS channel depends largely on the difference between the inherent values provided by two firms. Further, we prove that a prisoner’s dilemma exists under certain condition when two competing firms offer the BOPS channel. We also examine the impact of heterogeneous channel acceptance on the profits of two firms. We find that when only a firm offers the BOPS channel, the higher acceptance of BOPS means the higher profit of this firm and the less profit of its competitor. However, when both firms offer the BOPS channel, whether a firm can benefit from the increase in acceptance of BOPS depends on the inherent value it provides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feng, Y., Guo, Z., Chiang, W.K.: Optimal digital content distribution strategy in the presence of the consumer-to-consumer channel. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 25, 241–270 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222250408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao, F., Su, X.: Omnichannel retail operations with buy-online-and-pick-up-in-store. Manage. Sci. 63, 2478–2492 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, J., So, K.C., Yin, S.: Impact of an “online-to-store” channel on demand allocation, pricing and profitability. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248, 234–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, Y., Liu, H., Lim, E.T.K., Goh, J.M., Yang, F., Lee, M.K.O.: Customer’s reaction to cross-channel integration in omnichannel retailing: the mediating roles of retailer uncertainty, identity attractiveness, and switching costs. Decis. Support Syst. 109, 50–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallino, S., Moreno, A., Stamatopoulos, I.: Channel integration, sales dispersion, and inventory management. Manage. Sci. 63, 2813–2831 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, F., Su, X.: Online and offline information for omnichannel retailing. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19, 84–98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallino, S., Moreno, A.: Integration of online and offline channels in retail: the impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information. Manage. Sci. 60, 1434–1451 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y., Zhou, D., Chen, X.: Channel integration of BOPS considering off-line sales effort differences. J. Syst. Eng. 33, 90–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13383/j.cnki.jse.2018.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, M., Li, G., Cheng, T.C.E.: Buy online and pick up in-store: design of the service area. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268, 613–623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, F., Su, X.: Omnichannel service operations with online and offline self-order technologies. Manage. Sci. 64, 3595–3608 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Etzion, H., Pang, M.S.: Complementary online services in competitive markets: maintaining profitability in the presence of network effects. MIS. Q. 38, 231–248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, J., Guo, Z.: Strategic sourcing in the presence of uncertain supply and retail competition. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23, 1748–1760 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jena, S.K., Sarmah, S.P.: Price competition and co-operation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156, 346–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao, T., Xia, Y., Zhang, G.P.: Strategic outsourcing decisions for manufacturers competing on product quality. IIE Trans. 46, 313–329 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817x.2012.761368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, Y., Gao, X., Huang, C., Shu, J., Yang, D.: Service competition in an online duopoly market. Omega 77, 58–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, M., Dong, C., Cheng, T.C.E.: Quality disclosure strategies for small business enterprises in a competitive marketplace. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270, 218–229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hotelling, H.: Stability in competition. Econ. J. 39, 41–57 (1929). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8905-7_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo, W.S., Lee, E.: Internet channel entry: a strategic analysis of mixed channel structures. Market. Sci. 30, 29–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, L., Nan, G., Li, M.: Wholesale pricing or agency pricing on retail platforms: the effects of customer loyalty. Int. J. Electron. Comm. 24, 576–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2018.1485086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iyer, G.: Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition. Market. Sci. 17, 338–355 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.4.338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moorthy, K.S.: Product and price competition in a duopoly. Mark. Sci. 7, 141–168 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.7.2.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by research grant from the National Science Foundation of China (No. 71471128) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71631003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guofang Nan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, R., Chen, L., Feng, H., Nan, G., Li, M. (2019). Competitive Analysis of “Buy Online and Pick Up in Store” Channel. In: Xu, J., Zhu, B., Liu, X., Shaw, M., Zhang, H., Fan, M. (eds) The Ecosystem of e-Business: Technologies, Stakeholders, and Connections. WEB 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22784-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22784-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22783-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22784-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics