Skip to main content

Using Description Logic and Abox Abduction to Capture Medical Diagnosis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2019)

Abstract

Medical diagnosis can be defined as the detection of a disease by examining a patient’s signs, symptoms and history. Diagnostic reasoning can be viewed as a process of testing hypotheses guided by symptoms and signs. Solutions to diagnostic problems can be found by generating a limited number of hypotheses early in the diagnostic process and using them to guide subsequent collection of data. Each hypothesis, if correct, can be used to pre-dict what additional findings must be present, and the diagnostic process would then be a guided search for these findings. The process depends on the medical knowledge available. Description Logic-based ontologies provide class definitions (i.e., the necessary and sufficient conditions for defining class membership). In medicine, these definitions correspond to diagnostic criteria, i.e., the particular form of diseases should be associated with the relevant disease categories. In this paper, we model medical diagnosis as an (iterative) abductive reasoning process using ALC. ALC is employed to take advantage of its inference services. However, the inference capabilities provided by DL are not sufficient for diagnosis purposes. The contributions of the paper include: (1) arguing for the need for a disease-symptoms ontology, (2) proposing an ontological representation which, beside facilitating abductive reasoning, takes into account the diagnostic criteria such that specific patient conditions can be classified under a specific disease, and (3) employing Abox abduction to capture the process of medical diagnosis (the process of generating and testing hypotheses) on this proposed representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Shaikh, A., Khattab, H., Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N.: A defeasible description logic for representing bibliographic data. In: Taha, N., Al-Sayyed, R., Alqatawna, J., Rodan, A. (eds.) Social Media Shaping e-Publishing and Academia, pp. 95–105. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55354-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Temporal description logic for ontology-based data access. In: IJCAI 2013, pp. 711–717 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Stud. Logica 69, 5–40 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.) Description Logic Handbook, chapter 2, pp. 43–95 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertaud-Gounot, V., Duvauferrier, R., Burgun, A.: Ontology and medical diagnosis. Inf. Health Soc. Care 37(2), 51–61 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornet, R., de Keizer, N.: Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 8(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly, K.: SNOMED-CT: the advanced terminology and coding system for eHealth. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 121, 279 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Du, J., Qi, G., Shen, Y., Pan, J.: Towards practical Abox abduction in large OWL DL ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1160–1165 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: The complexity of logic-based abduction. J. ACM 42(1), 3–42 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsenbroich, C., Kutz, O., Sattler, U., et al.: A case for abductive reasoning over ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th OWL: Experiences and Directions, pp. 56–75. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halland, K., Britz, K.: Naive ABox abduction in ALC using a DL tableau. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL), pp. 443–453 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hijazi, S., Jabri, R., Obeid, N.: On drug dosage control using description defeasible logic. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical reasoning for expressive description logics. In: Ganzinger, H., McAllester, D., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1705, pp. 161–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48242-3_11

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A description logic with transitive and inverse roles and role hierarchies. J. Log. Comput. 9(3), 385–410 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Klarman, S., Eendriss, U., Schlobach, S., et al.: ABox abduction in the description logic ALC. J. Autom. Reason. 46(1), 43–80 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnani, L.: Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine. In: Evans, D.A., Patel, V.L. (eds.) Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice. Springer, Berlin (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02833-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Magnani, L.: Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N.: The role of dialogue in remote diagnostics. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Condition Monitoring & Diagnostic Engineering Management (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N.: Dialogue and argumentation in multi-agent diagnosis. In: Nguyen, N.T., Katarzyniak, R. (eds.) New Challenges in Applied Intelligence Technologies, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 134, pp. 13–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79355-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N.: Partial information basis for agent-based collaborative dialogue. Appl. Intell. 30(2), 142–167 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N.: On formalizing social commitments in dialogue and argumentation models using temporal defeasible logic. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 37(2), 417–452 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moubaiddin, A., Salah, I., Obeid, N.: A temporal modal defeasible logic for formalizing social commitments in dialogue and argumentation models. Appl. Intell. 48(3), 608–627 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Obeid, N.: Three valued logic and nonmonotonic reasoning. Comput. Artif. Intell. 15(6), 509–530 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Obeid, N.: Towards a model of learning through communication. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2(4), 498–508 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Obeid, N.: A formalism for representing and reasoning with temporal information, event and change. Appl. Intell. 23(2), 109–119 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Obeid, N., Moubaiddin, A.: Towards a formal model of knowledge sharing in complex systems. In: Szczerbicki, E., Nguyen, N.T. (eds.) Smart Information and Knowledge Management, Studies in Computational Intelligence Series, pp. 53–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04584-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Obeid, N., Rao, R.B.: On integrating event definition and event detection. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 129–158 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Obeid, N., Rawashdeh, E., Alduweib, E., Moubaiddin, A.: On ontology-based diagnosis and defeasibility. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 57–62. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. PukancovĂ¡, J., Martin, H.: Abductive reasoning with description logics: use case in medical diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Workshop on Description Logics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sabri, K.E., Obeid, N.: A temporal defeasible logic for handling access control policies. Appl. Intell. 44(1), 30–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadim Obeid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Obeid, M., Obeid, Z., Moubaiddin, A., Obeid, N. (2019). Using Description Logic and Abox Abduction to Capture Medical Diagnosis. In: Wotawa, F., Friedrich, G., Pill, I., Koitz-Hristov, R., Ali, M. (eds) Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11606. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22998-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22999-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics