Skip to main content

Online Assessment of Belief Biases and Their Impact on the Acceptance of Fallacious Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11626))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2988 Accesses

Abstract

Determining the impact of belief bias on everyday reasoning is critical for understanding how our beliefs can influence how we judge arguments. We examined the impact of belief bias on the user’s ability to identify logical fallacies in political arguments. We found that participants had more difficulty identifying logical fallacies in arguments that aligned with their own political beliefs. Interestingly, this effect diminishes with practice. These results suggest that while belief bias is a potential barrier to correctly evaluating everyday arguments, interventions focused on activating rational engagement may mitigate its impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diana, N., Stamper, J., Koedinger, K.: An instructional factors analysis of an online logical fallacy tutoring system. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 86–97. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, J.S., Barston, J.L., Pollard, P.: On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Mem. Cogn. 11(3), 295–306 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haidt, J.: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108(4), 814 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henle, M., Michael, M.: The influence of attitudes on syllogistic reasoning. J. Soc. Psychol. 44(1), 115–127 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1956.9921907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lefford, A.: The influence of emotonal subject matter on logical reasoning. J. Gen. Psychol. 34, 127–151 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1946.10544530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markovits, H., Nantel, G.: The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Mem. Cogn. 17(1), 11–17 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan, J.J.B., Morton, J.T.: The distortion of syllogistic reasoning produced by personal convictions. J. Soc. Psychol. 20(1), 39–59 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1944.9918830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Revlin, R., Leirer, V., Yopp, H., Yopp, R.: The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: the influence of knowledge on logic. Mem. Cogn. 8(6), 584–592 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Diana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Diana, N., Stamper, J., Koedinger, K. (2019). Online Assessment of Belief Biases and Their Impact on the Acceptance of Fallacious Reasoning. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics