Skip to main content

Finding Relevant e-Learning Materials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11626))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2991 Accesses

Abstract

Learners in e-Learning environments often have difficulty finding and retrieving relevant learning materials to support their learning goals because they lack sufficient domain knowledge to craft effective queries that convey what they wish to learn. In addition, the unfamiliar vocabulary often used by domain experts makes it difficult to map learners’ queries to relevant documents. Hence the need to develop a suitable method that would support finding and recommending relevant learning materials to learners. These challenges are addressed by exploiting a knowledge-rich method that automatically creates custom background knowledge in the form of a set of rich concepts related to the selected learning domain. A method is developed which allows the background knowledge to influence the refinement of queries during the recommendation of learning materials. The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated on a dataset of Machine Learning and Data Mining documents and it is shown to outperform benchmark methods. The results confirm that adopting a knowledge-rich representation within e-Learning recommendation improves the ability to find and recommend relevant e-Learning materials to learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu, J., Kim, C.S., Creel, C.: Why do users feel search task difficult? In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wood, E., et al.: Exploration of the relative contributions of domain knowledge and search expertise for conducting internet searches. Ref. Libr. 57(3), 182–204 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meij, E., Bron, M., Hollink, L., Huurnink, B., de Rijke, M.: Mapping queries to the linking open data cloud: a case study using DBpedia. Web Semant.: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 9(4), 418–433 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendersky, M., Metzler, D., and Croft, W. B.: Effective query formulation with multiple information sources. In: 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 443–452 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mbipom, B., Massie, S., and Craw, S.: An e-Learning recommender that helps learners find the right materials. In: Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 7928–7933. AAAI Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, X., Liu, J., Cole, M.: Task topic knowledge vs. background domain knowledge: impact of two types of knowledge on user search performance. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Wilson, T., Stroetmann, K. (eds.) Adv. Inf. Syst. Technol., pp. 179–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heeren, B., Jeuring, J.: An extensible domain-specific language for describing problem-solving procedures. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 77–89. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lally, A., et al.: WatsonPaths: scenario-based question answering and inference over unstructured information. AI Mag. 38(2), 59–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopp, K.J., Johnson, A.M., Crossley, S.A., McNamara, D.S.: Assessing question quality using NLP. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 523–527. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mbipom, B., Craw, S., Massie, S.: Harnessing background knowledge for e-Learning recommendation. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds.) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47175-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mbipom, B.: Knowledge driven approaches to e-Learning recommendation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Copeland, M., Soh, J., Puca, A., Manning, M., Gollob, D.: Microsoft Azure: Planning, Deploying, and Managing Your Data Center in the Cloud. Apress, New York (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blessing Mbipom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mbipom, B. (2019). Finding Relevant e-Learning Materials. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics