Abstract
How much students learn from instructional videos is influenced by the type of video. Prior work has shown that when students are given a video showing a dialog between a tutor and a tutee, they learn more than if the video shows a monolog delivered by a tutor. To date, however, there does not exist work investigating how each type of video impacts student affect. To fill this gap, we apply sentiment analysis to transcripts of students learning in each context. We show that learning from videos with dialog fosters more positive affect for university-level students, but not for middle-school students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., Tai, M.: A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 387 (2014)
Baker, R.S., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: the incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 68(4), 223–241 (2010)
Chi, M.T., Kang, S., Yaghmourian, D.L.: Why students learn more from dialogue-than monologue-videos: analyses of peer interactions. J. Learn. Sci. 26(1), 10–50 (2017)
Craig, S.D., Chi, M.T., VanLehn, K.: Improving classroom learning by collaboratively observing human tutoring videos while problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 101(4), 779–789 (2009)
Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Brittingham, J.K., Williams, J.L., Shubeck, K.T.: Promoting vicarious learning of physics using deep questions with explanations. Comput. Educ. 58(4), 1042–1048 (2012)
Craig, S., Driscoll, D., Gholson, B.: Constructing knowledge from dialog in an intelligent tutoring system: interactive learning, vicarious learning, and pedagogical agents. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia 13(2), 163–183 (2004)
Crossley, S., Kyle, K., McNamara, D.: Sentiment analysis and social cognition engine (SEANCE): an automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social order analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 49(3), 803 (2017)
D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Autotutor and affective autotutor. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2(4), 1–39 (2012)
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 153–170 (2014)
Gholson, B., Craig, S.D.: Promoting constructive activities that support vicarious learning during computer-based instruction. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 18(2), 119–139 (2006)
Kizilcec, R.: Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 2095–2102 (2014)
Muldner, K., Lam, R., Chi, M.T.H.: Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 106(1), 69–85 (2014)
Muller, D.A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M.D., Reimann, P.: Saying the wrong thing: improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 24(2), 144–155 (2008)
Muller, D.A., Sharma, M.D., Eklund, J., Reimann, P.: Conceptual change through vicarious learning in an authentic physics setting. Instr. Sci. 35(6), 519–533 (2007)
Newman, H., Joyner, D.: Sentiment analysis of student evaluations of teaching. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 246–250. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_45
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self- regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37(2), 91–105 (2002)
Putwain, D.W., Becker, S., Symes, W., Pekrun, R.: Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time. Learn. Instr. 54, 73–81 (2018)
Van Gog, T., Verveer, I., Verveer, L.: Learning from video modeling examples: effects of seeing the human model’s face. Comput. Educ. 72, 323–327 (2014)
Worsley, M., Blikstein, P.: What’s an expert? Using learning analytics to identify emergent markers of expertise through automated speech, sentiment and sketch analysis. In: Educational Data Mining Conference, pp. 235–240 (2011)
Yang, D., Kraut, R., Rose, C.: Exploring the effect of student confusion in massive open online courses. J. Educ. Data Min. 8(1), 52–83 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stranc, S., Muldner, K. (2019). Learning from Videos Showing a Dialog Fosters More Positive Affect Than Learning from a Monolog. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)