Skip to main content

Commercial Activity Trackers Overestimate Step Count: Implications for Ambulatory Activity Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2019 - Posters (HCII 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1034))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Guidelines for Physical Activity (PA) include a minimum of 150 min of moderate PA each week for adults, and at least 60 daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA for youth aged 6–17 years. The burden to monitor self-compliance lies on the individual and involves tracking content, intensity, and temporal breakdown of daily activities while delineating these as light-, moderate-, or vigorous-intensity. Presenting PA recommendations as steps per day makes them more accessible. Inaccurate step counts can mislead individuals looking to meet recommendations using a step count paradigm. This research evaluated the degree to which wrist and hip worn activity trackers misattribute steps to non-ambulatory activities and overestimate total step count. An adult male (age: 41 years; height: 1.7 m; mass: 74 kg) wore a Fitbit Versa and Apple Watch on his wrist and a Withings Go and an Apple iPhone 7-deployed Pedometer++ application on his lateral hip. The participant walked and ran for a total of 84 and 100 steps, respectively, and performed 20 vertical jumps, 20 bilateral hops, 20 squats, and 20 sit-to-stand tasks. The mean step count and percent error between observed step count and total step count output from each device were calculated. Fitbit Versa, Apple Watch, Pedometer++, and Withings Go overestimated total step count by 110%, 126%, 48%, 97%, respectively. It was concluded that both low- and high-end commercial activity trackers attribute steps to non-ambulatory activities and consequently overestimate step count. This can mislead individuals who rely on these activity trackers to monitor their step count. Therefore, there is need for algorithms with improved activity recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lauby-Secretan, B., et al.: Body fatness and cancer-viewpoint of the IARC working group. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 794–798 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edn. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Craemer, M., De Decker, E., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., Manios, Y., Cardon, G.: The translation of preschoolers’ physical activity guidelines into a daily step count target. J. Sports Sci. 33, 1051–1057 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabel, L., et al.: Step count targets corresponding to new physical activity guidelines for the early years. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 45, 314–318 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tudor-Locke, C., Sisson, S.B., Collova, T., Lee, S.M., Swan, P.D.: Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 30, 666–676 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva, M.P., Fontana, F.E., Callahan, E., Mazzardo, O., De Campos, W.: Step-count guidelines for children and adolescents: a systematic review. J. Phys. Act. Health 12, 1184–1191 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whittle, M., Richards, J., Levine, D.: Whittle’s Gait Analysis. Churchill Livingstone, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winter, D.A.: Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassett Jr., D.R., Ainsworth, B.E., Swartz, A.M., Strath, S.J., O’Brien, W.L., King, G.A.: Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32, S471–S480 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hendelman, D., Miller, K., Baggett, C., Debold, E., Freedson, P.: Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32, S442–S449 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tudor-Locke, C., Williams, J.E., Reis, J.P., Pluto, D.: Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. Sports Med. 32, 795–808 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Godfrey, A., Del Din, S., Barry, G., Mathers, J.C., Rochester, L.: Instrumenting gait with an accelerometer: a system and algorithm examination. Med. Eng. Phys. 37, 400–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toyin Ajisafe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hernandez, A., Ajisafe, T., Lee, B.C., Xie, J. (2019). Commercial Activity Trackers Overestimate Step Count: Implications for Ambulatory Activity Monitoring. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2019 - Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23524-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23525-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics