Skip to main content

Do Self-reported Playing Preferences Correlate with Emotional Reactions During Playing? Evidence from Psychophysiological Recordings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2019 - Posters (HCII 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1033))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2017 Accesses

Abstract

According to certain player typologies, players report preferring some game dynamics more than others [1]. However, it is unclear whether these self-reported preferences show carryover effects during actual playing. For instance, do players who report liking dynamics of killing and shooting show positive emotions during playing games that incorporate such elements? We recruited active gamers (N = 24) and divided them into two groups: those who preferred and those who disliked aggressive game dynamics. In the experiment, both groups played a first person shooter game as well as watched a video of someone else playing the game. We recorded psychophysiological responses for facial muscle activation, electrodermal activity and heartbeat to explore the participants’ emotional valence and arousal states during playing and watching. The results indicate that the groups did not differ in their emotional responses, suggesting that self-reported playing preferences may not be an accurate way to measure actual emotional responses during playing. The results also illustrate that gaming seems to affect players in a similar way regardless of their self-reported likes and preferences. Furthermore, the results showed that actual playing induces more positive and negative emotions (as indexed by smiling and frowning) than watching someone else play, and is emotionally more arousing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vahlo, J., Kaakinen, J.K., Holm, S.K., Koponen, A.: Digital game dynamics preferences and player types. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 22(2), 88–103 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamari, J., Tuunanen, J.: Player types: A meta-synthesis. Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc. 1(2), 29–53 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J. MUD Res. 1, 19 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drachen, A., Canossa, A., Yannakakis, G.N.: Player modeling using self-organization in Tomb Raider: underworld. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2009), pp. 1–8 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed, I., Mahapatra, A., Poole, M.S., Srivastava, J., Brown, C.: Identifying a typology of players based on longitudinal game data. In: Ahmad, M.A., Shen, C., Srivastava, J., Contractor, N. (eds.) Predicting Real World Behaviors from Virtual World Data, pp. 103–115. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07142-8_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths, M.D., Davies, M.N.O., Chappell, D.: Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. J. Adolesc. 27(1), 87–96 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Terlecki, M., et al.: Sex differences and similarities in video game experience, preferences, and self-efficacy: implications for the gaming industry. Curr. Psychol. 30(1), 22–33 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bateman, C., Lowenhaupt, R., Nacke, L.E.: Player typology in theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play (DiGRA 2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tseng, F.-C.: Segmenting online gamers by motivation. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(6), 7693–7697 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whang, L.S.-M., Chang, G.: Lifestyles of virtual world residents: Living in the on-line game “Lineage”. CyberPsychol. Behav. 7(5), 592–600 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yee, N.: Motivations for Play in online games. J. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9(6), 772–775 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Nelson, L.: Online gaming motivations scale: development and validation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), pp. 2803–2806 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuittinen, J., Kultima, A., Niemelä, J., Paavilainen, J.: Casual games discussion. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (Future Play 2007), pp. 105–112 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tondello, G., Wehbe, R., Orji, R., Ribeiro, G., Nacke, L.: A framework and taxonomy of videogame playing preferences. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 329–340 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suvi K. Holm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Holm, S.K., Forsström, S., Kaakinen, J.K., Surakka, V. (2019). Do Self-reported Playing Preferences Correlate with Emotional Reactions During Playing? Evidence from Psychophysiological Recordings. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2019 - Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1033. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23528-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23528-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23527-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23528-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics