Skip to main content

Abstract

Nature is nowadays considered the most restorative environment. A brief exposure to a (real or virtual) nature environment help people to restore cognitive and affective resources. However, (1) the precise mechanism through nature support restorative process is undervalued in literature; (2) testing the possibility that a virtual reality (VR) device can evoke similar outcomes as real nature, the usability of such devices become an important factor to consider in the research. In this study we hypothesize a moderation effect of usability of device on the relationship between perceived restorative potential (PRP) of the environment and restorative outcomes (emotional and cognitive). 114 Italian students (83% female, mean (ds) age = 22.38 (6.50)) were immersed into a virtual nature environment using a virtual reality head-set (Oculus Rift). Before and after exposure, mood (positive and negative emotions) and attentive performance were evaluated. After exposure participants were also asked to report PRP and usability of VR device experienced. Result showed that the PRP predict emotional well-being, and that this relationship is moderated by usability of VR device. Only participants that perceived a high usability report different levels of emotions depending on how much they perceived the environment restorative. Conversely, people how reported difficulties in wearing headset VR or to adapt to the environment (i.e., low level of usability) did not show difference in emotional well-being depending on PRP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ohly, H., White, M.P., Wheeler, B.W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O.C., Nikolaou, V., Garside, R.: Attention restoration theory: a systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 19(7), 305–343 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beute, F., de Kort, Y.A.: Salutogenic effects of the environment: review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 6(1), 67–95 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McMahan, E.A., Estes, D.: The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: a meta-analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartig, T.: Restorative environments. In: Spielberger, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, vol. 3. Academic Press, San Diego (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ulrich, R.S.: Visual landscapes and psychological weel-being. Landsc. Res. 4(1), 17–23 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulrich, R.S.: Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Human Behavior and Environment, vol. 6: Behavior and Natural Environment. Plenum, New York (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S.: The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan, S.: The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15, 169–182 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Staats, H.: Restorative environments. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearson, D.G., Craig, T.: The great outdoors? Exploring the mental health benefits of natural environments. Front. Psychol. 5, 1–4 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berto, R.: Assessing the restorative value of the environment: a study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. Int. J. Psychol. 42(5), 331–341 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takayama, N., et al.: Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 7207–7230 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schutte, N.S., Bhullar, N., Richardson, E.J., Stilinovic, K.: The impact of virtual environments on restorativeness and affect. Ecopsychology 9(1), 1–7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marselle, M.R., Irvine, K.N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., Warber, S.L.: Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? J. Environ. Psychol. 46, 217–232 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McAllister, E., Bhullar, N., Schutte, N.S.: Into the woods or a stroll in the park: how virtual contact with nature impacts positive and negative affect. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(7), 786 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valtchanov, D., Barton, K.R., Ellard, C.: Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13(5), 503–512 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Valtchanov, D., Ellard, C.: Physiological and affective responses to immersion in virtual reality: effect of nature and urban settings. J. CyberTher. Rehabil. 3(4), 359–373 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Kooijman, J., Schuurmans, Y.: Virtual laboratories: comparability of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology. Presence, Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12, 360–373 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Kort, Y.A.W., Meijnders, A.L., Sponselee, A.A.G., Ijsselsteijn, W.A.: What’s wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 26, 309–320 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shackel, B.: Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact. Comput. 21(5–6), 339–346 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freina, L., Ott, M.: A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Proceedings, p. 133, Bucharest (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Raccanello, D., Brondino, M., Pasini, M.: Achievement emotions in technology enhanced learning: development and validation of self-report instruments in the italian context. Interact. Des. Arch. J. 23, 68–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manly, T.: The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 37(6), 661–670 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. OculusRift-Virtual Reality Headset for 3D Gaming Homepage. https://www.oculus.com/. Accessed 19 Jan 2019

  25. Pasini, M., Berto, R., Brondino, M., Hall, R., Ortner, C.: How to measure the restorative quality of environments: the PRS-11. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 159, 293–297 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mueller, S.T., Piper, B.J.: The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. J. Neurosci. Methods 222, 250–259 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2012). http://www.R-project.org/. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  28. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., Kaplan, S.: The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci. 19(12), 1207–1212 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berman, M.G., Kross, E., Krpan, K.M., Askren, M.K., Burson, A., Deldin, P.J., Kaplan, S., Sherdell, L., Gotlib, I.H., Jonides, J.: Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J. Affect. Disord. 140(3), 300–305 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bronack, S., Sanders, R., Cheney, A., Riedl, R., Tashner, J., Matzen, N.: Presence pedagogy: teaching and learning in a 3D virtual immersive world. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 20(1), 59–69 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Riva, G.: Virtual reality: an experiential tool for clinical psychology. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 37(3), 337–345 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, H., Daugherty, T., Biocca, F.: Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce: a protocol analysis. J. Interact. Mark. 15(3), 13–30 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Freeman, D., Reeve, S., Robinson, A., Ehlers, A., Clark, D., Spanlang, B., Slater, M.: Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychiatry Med. 47(14), 2393–2400 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Menardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Menardo, E., Scarpanti, D., Pasini, M., Brondino, M. (2020). Usability of Virtual Environment for Emotional Well-Being. In: Gennari, R., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1007 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23990-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics