Skip to main content

Multi-criteria Evaluation vs Perceived Urban Quality: An Exploratory Comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019 (ICCSA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11621))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1347 Accesses

Abstract

This study compares a service-based and environmental evaluation of an urban area with that of its perceived walkability. The Pampulha region in Belo Horizonte, Brazil was first put through a multi-criteria spatial evaluation with respect to a set of spatial data considered relevant for liveability and quality of life in cities, and was subsequently assessed in terms of perceived walkability (using a machine learning procedure of a training set provided by local auditors). The two types of analysis were compared and qualitatively aggregated to obtain a joint spatial score of the urban environment. The findings provide useful insights for planning and urban policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sen, A.: The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A., Talu, V.: Capability approach and urban planning. Fertile urban capabilities and quality of urban life of the most disadvantaged inhabitants [Approccio delle capacità e pianificazione urbana. Capacità urbane feconde e qualità della vita urbana degli abitanti più svantaggiati]. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali 48, 34–52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3280/ASUR2018-122003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brighouse, H., Robeyns, I.: Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Sen, A.: Utilitarianism and welfarism. J. Philos. 76, 463–489 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/2025934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocha, N.A., Moura, A.C.M., Casagrande, P.: Análise combinatória e pesos de evidência na produção de análise de multicritérios em modelos de avaliação. Geogr. y Sistemas de Información Geográfica (GEOSIG) 11, 49–74 (2018). https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/79758e_4d6e3e3aa4394cb99da67962a23aa240.pdf

  6. Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Jankowski, P.: Impact of proximity-adjusted preferences on rank-order stability in geographical multicriteria decision analysis. J. Geogr. Syst. 14, 167–187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0140-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Jankowski, P.: Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation. Environ. Model Softw. 57, 235–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moura, A.C.M., Jankowski, P.L.: Contribuições aos estudos de análises de incertezas como complementação às análises multicritérios - “sensitivity analysis to suitability evaluation”. Revista Brasileira de Cartografi 68, 665–684 (2016). http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistabrasileiracartografia/article/view/44274

  9. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9, 458–467 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moura, A.C.M.: Reflexões metodológicas como subsídio para estudos ambientais baseados em análise multicritérios. In: Anais XIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, pp. 2899–2906. INPE, Florianópolis (2007). http://marte.sid.inpe.br/col/dpi.inpe.br/sbsr@80/2006/11.13.14.41/doc/2899-2906.pdf

  11. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A., Trunfio, G.A.: Towards automatic assessment of perceived walkability. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2018. LNCS, vol. 10962, pp. 351–365. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, B., Lapedriza, A., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Places: a 10 million image database for scene recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 40, 1452–1464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2723009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, M., Chen, Q., Yan, S.: Network in network (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4400v3

  15. Crammer, K., Singer, Y.: Pranking with ranking. In: Dietterich, T.G., Becker, S., Ghahramani, Z. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14, pp. 641–647. MIT Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. da Costa, J.P., Cardoso, J.S.: Classification of ordinal data using neural networks. In: Gama, J., Camacho, R., Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M., Torgo, L. (eds.) ECML 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3720, pp. 690–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11564096_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Chollet, F., et. al.: Keras (2015). https://github.com/fchollet/keras

  18. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. https://www.tensorflow.org/

  19. Zeiler, M.D.: ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method (2012). https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701v1

  20. Moura, A.C.M., Ramos, V., Faria, D., Freitas, V.: Geodesign no ensino de planejamento urbano em escala local: a construção compartilhada de ideias para projetos e políticas. Geogr. y Sistemas de Información Geográfica (GEOSIG) 11, 127–152 (2018). https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/79758e_17fda28772a247458c4f086b58e33281.pdf

  21. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the research grants for the projects: “Healthy Cities and Smart Territories” (2016/17) funded by Fondazione di Sardegna and the Autonomous Region of Sardinia. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Quadro P6000 GPU used for this research. In Brazil, the study was supported by CNPq, Process 401066/2016-9, Edital Universal 01/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Blečić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blečić, I., Santos, A.G., Moura, A.C., Trunfio, G.A. (2019). Multi-criteria Evaluation vs Perceived Urban Quality: An Exploratory Comparison. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24301-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24302-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics