Abstract
In the era of telecommunications, where mobile phones are becoming continuously smarter, how users interact with smartphones plays a very essential role, magnified by statistics that reveal great increase in human time spent in human-smartphone interaction. Some of the basic reasons for users to use their smartphones include notifications, whose functionality has been investigated and improved over the last decade. As a result, this mechanism, namely smartphone notifications, is not only well-rounded by both OS vendors and app developers, but is also inextricably accompanying vital parts of the majority of modern mobile applications. This paper analyzes flaws in this fundamental mechanism, as found in the most widespread mobile OS to date, namely Android. After presenting forging smartphone application notifications and Denial of Service attacks to the users’ device, accomplished both locally and remotely, we conclude by proposing generic countermeasures for the security threats in question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pielot, M., Church, K., de Oliveira, R.: An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & #38; Services, MobileHCI 2014, New York, NY, USA, pp. 233–242. ACM (2014)
ZDNet: Whatsapp: Now one billion people send 55 billion messages per day. http://www.zdnet.com/article/whatsapp-now-one-billion-people-send-55-billion-messages-per-day/. Accessed 27 July 2017
Biznessapps: What is a push notification? And why should you care? https://www.biznessapps.com/blog/what-is-a-push-notification/. Accessed 27 July 2017
O’Connell, C.: The year that push notifications grew up (2015). http://info.localytics.com/blog/2015-the-year-that-push-notifications-grew-up. Accessed 01 Sept 2017
Urban Airship: New urban airship study reveals app publishers that don’t message users waste 95 percent of their acquisition spend. https://www.urbanairship.com/company/press-releases/new-urban-airship-mobile-app-retention-study. Accessed 01 Sept 2017
Freyne, J., Yin, J., Brindal, E., Hendrie, G., Berkovsky, S., Noakes, M.: Push notifications in diet apps: influencing engagement times and tasks. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33, 833–845 (2017)
Kerber, F., Gehring, S., Krüger, A., Löchtefeld, M.: Adding expressiveness to smartwatch notifications through ambient illumination. IJMHCI 9, 1–14 (2017)
Mahmud, M.S., Islam, M.S., Rahman, M.A.: Smart fire detection system with early notifications using machine learning. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl. 16, 1–17 (2017)
Wang, Y., Millet, B., Smith, J.L.: Designing wearable vibrotactile notifications for information communication. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 89, 24–34 (2016)
Patsakis, C., Alepis, E.: Knock-knock: the unbearable lightness of Android notifications. In: Mori, P., Furnell, S., Camp, O. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy, ICISSP 2018, Funchal, Madeira - Portugal, 22–24 January 2018, pp. 52–61. SciTePress (2018)
Wei, F., Li, Y., Roy, S., Ou, X., Zhou, W.: Deep ground truth analysis of current Android malware. In: Polychronakis, M., Meier, M. (eds.) DIMVA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10327, pp. 252–276. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60876-1_12
Chin, E., Felt, A.P., Greenwood, K., Wagner, D.: Analyzing inter-application communication in Android. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 239–252. ACM (2011)
Niemietz, M., Schwenk, J.: UI redressing attacks on Android devices. Black Hat Abu Dhabi (2012)
Ying, L., Cheng, Y., Lu, Y., Gu, Y., Su, P., Feng, D.: Attacks and defence on Android free floating windows. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ASIA CCS 2016, New York, NY, USA, pp. 759–770. ACM (2016)
Fratantonio, Y., Qian, C., Chung, S., Lee, W.: Cloak and dagger: from two permissions to complete control of the UI feedback loop. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Oakland), San Jose, CA (2017)
Android Developer: Manifest.permission - SYSTEM\(\_\)ALERT\(\_\)WINDOW. https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission.html#SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW. Accessed 28 Mar 2017
Alepis, E., Patsakis, C.: Trapped by the UI: the Android case. In: Dacier, M., Bailey, M., Polychronakis, M., Antonakakis, M. (eds.) RAID 2017. LNCS, vol. 10453, pp. 334–354. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66332-6_15
Chen, Q.A., Qian, Z., Mao, Z.M.: Peeking into your app without actually seeing it: UI state inference and novel android attacks. In: USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 1037–1052 (2014)
Xu, Z., Zhu, S.: Abusing notification services on smartphones for phishing and spamming. In: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Conference on Offensive Technologies, USENIX Association, p. 1 (2012)
Felt, A.P., Wagner, D.: Phishing on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2011 Workshop (2011)
Virvilis, N., Tsalis, N., Mylonas, A., Gritzalis, D.: Mobile devices: a phisher’s paradise. In: 2014 11th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2014)
Virvou, M., Alepis, E.: Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalised tutoring. Comput. Educ. 44, 53–68 (2005)
Papageorgiou, A., Strigkos, M., Politou, E.A., Alepis, E., Solanas, A., Patsakis, C.: Security and privacy analysis of mobile health applications: the alarming state of practice. IEEE Access 6, 9390–9403 (2018)
Casino, F., Patsakis, C., Batista, E., Borras, F., MartĂnez-BallestĂ©, A.: Healthy routes in the smart city: a context-aware mobile recommender. IEEE Softw. 34, 42–47 (2017)
StatCounter GlobalStats: Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide. http://gs.statcounter.com/press/mobile-and-tablet-internet-usage-exceeds-desktop-for-first-time-worldwide. Accessed 01 Sept 2017
Flurry Analytics: U.s. consumers time-spent on mobile crosses 5 hours a day. http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/157921590345/us-consumers-time-spent-on-mobile-crosses-5. Accessed 01 Sept 2017
Commscope: The generation z study of tech intimates (2017). https://commscope.com/insights/uploads/2017/09/Generation-Z-Report.pdf
Alepis, E., Patsakis, C.: The all seeing eye: web to app intercommunication for session fingerprinting in Android. In: Wang, G., Atiquzzaman, M., Yan, Z., Choo, K.-K.R. (eds.) SpaCCS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10656, pp. 93–107. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72389-1_9
Perez, S.: Nearly 1 in 4 people abandon mobile apps after only one use (2016). https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/31/nearly-1-in-4-people-abandon-mobile-apps-after-only-one-use/
Perro, J.: Mobile apps: What’s a good retention rate? (2018). http://info.localytics.com/blog/mobile-apps-whats-a-good-retention-rate
Samanta, I.: Exploring the factors of customer retention in mobile sector. IJSITA 3, 36–46 (2012)
Peng, J., Zhang, S., Quan, J., Wei, Z.: Effectiveness of mobile phone customer retention strategies. In: 11th Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, WHICEB 2012, Wuhan, China, 26–27 May 2012, vol. 63. Association for Information Systems (2012)
Viljanen, M., Airola, A., Pahikkala, T., Heikkonen, J.: Modelling user retention in mobile games. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2016, Santorini, Greece, 20–23 September 2016, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2016)
Zhou, Y., Raake, A., Xu, T., Zhang, X.: Users’ perceived control, trust and expectation on privacy settings of smartphone. In: Wen, S., Wu, W., Castiglione, A. (eds.) CSS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10581, pp. 427–441. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69471-9_31
Choi, H., Choi, Y.-J., Kim, K.-M.: The understanding of building trust model on smartphone application: focusing on users’ motivation. In: Kim, K.J., Ahn, S.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on IT Convergence and Security 2011. LNEE, vol. 120, pp. 13–20. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2911-7_2
Mylonas, A., Gritzalis, D., Tsoumas, B., Apostolopoulos, T.: A qualitative metrics vector for the awareness of smartphone security users. In: Furnell, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., Lopez, J. (eds.) TrustBus 2013. LNCS, vol. 8058, pp. 173–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40343-9_15
Bianchi, A., Corbetta, J., Invernizzi, L., Fratantonio, Y., Kruegel, C., Vigna, G.: What the app is that? deception and countermeasures in the Android user interface. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 931–948. IEEE (2015)
Wu, L., Brandt, B., Du, X., Ji, B.: Analysis of clickjacking attacks and an effective defense scheme for Android devices. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), pp. 55–63. IEEE (2016)
Ying, L., Cheng, Y., Lu, Y., Gu, Y., Su, P., Feng, D.: Attacks and defence on Android free floating windows. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 759–770. ACM (2016)
Ren, C., Liu, P., Zhu, S.: Windowguard: Systematic protection of GUI security in Android. In: Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (2017)
Malisa, L., Kostiainen, K., Och, M., Capkun, S.: Mobile application impersonation detection using dynamic user interface extraction. In: Askoxylakis, I., Ioannidis, S., Katsikas, S., Meadows, C. (eds.) ESORICS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9878, pp. 217–237. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45744-4_11
Malisa, L., Kostiainen, K., Capkun, S.: Detecting mobile application spoofing attacks by leveraging user visual similarity perception. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM on Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, pp. 289–300. ACM (2017)
Fernandes, E., Chen, Q.A., Paupore, J., Essl, G., Halderman, J.A., Mao, Z.M., Prakash, A.: Android UI deception revisited: attacks and defenses. In: Grossklags, J., Preneel, B. (eds.) FC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9603, pp. 41–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_3
Marforio, C., Jayaram Masti, R., Soriente, C., Kostiainen, K., Čapkun, S.: Evaluation of personalized security indicators as an anti-phishing mechanism for smartphone applications. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 540–551. ACM (2016)
Wu, L., Du, X., Wu, J.: Effective defense schemes for phishing attacks on mobile computing platforms. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65, 6678–6691 (2016)
Heartfield, R., Loukas, G.: A taxonomy of attacks and a survey of defence mechanisms for semantic social engineering attacks. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 48, 37 (2016)
Aleroud, A., Zhou, L.: Phishing environments, techniques, and countermeasures: a survey. Comput. Secur. 68, 160–196 (2017)
Holgers, T., Watson, D.E., Gribble, S.D.: Cutting through the confusion: a measurement study of homograph attacks. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track, pp. 261–266 (2006)
Liu, C., Stamm, S.: Fighting unicode-obfuscated spam. In: Proceedings of the Anti-Phishing Working Groups 2nd Annual eCrime Researchers Summit, pp. 45–59. ACM (2007)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the European Commission under the Horizon 2020 Programme (H2020), as part of the OPERANDO project (Grant Agreement no. 653704) and is based upon work from COST Action CRYPTACUS, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The authors would like to thank ElevenPaths for their valuable feedback and granting them access to Tacyt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alepis, E. (2019). Notify This: Exploiting Android Notifications for Fun and Profit. In: Mori, P., Furnell, S., Camp, O. (eds) Information Systems Security and Privacy. ICISSP 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 977. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25109-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25109-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25108-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25109-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)